THE war in Ukraine should not result in plans for a second Scottish independence referendum being pushed back, Ian Blackford has indicated.
The SNP Westminster leader's comments came as a former senior member of staff within the SNP claimed it is “unlikely” a ballot on Scotland’s future in the UK will take place within Nicola Sturgeon’s preferred time frame.
The First Minister has repeatedly said her intention is to hold another referendum by the midway point in this Holyrood term – although the UK Government remains against such plans.
READ MORE: Anger at Boris Johnson's comparison of war in Ukraine to Brexit
Kevin Pringle, who was a special adviser to former first minister Alex Salmond and held key roles within the SNP and the Yes Scotland campaign, said it is “unlikely” there will be a fresh vote on the issue by the end of next year “given the hurdles to be overcome”.
Writing in the Sunday Times, Pringle said: “It is unwise to make any definite predictions in such volatile times, but it seems reasonable to say out loud that an independence referendum is unlikely to take place by the end of next year, given the hurdles to be overcome and extensive preparations required.
“I don’t think the war in Ukraine has changed this, in the sense that it was no more likely before the Russian invasion and all the destruction and instability being wreaked.”
Pringle told The Times he believed indyref2 in 2023 is 'unlikely'
However Blackford is insistent that the conflict in Ukraine should not delay plans for indyref2.
Speaking on BBC Scotland’s Sunday Show, he said: “Is anybody suggesting that (Russian President Vladimir) Putin should determine the timeline for an independence referendum in Scotland?”
The SNP MP pointed out his party had fought last year’s Scottish Parliament election on a manifesto which included a commitment to holding a second vote on independence.
The SNP failed to win an outright majority at Holyrood, but the addition of Green MSPs through the co-operation agreement – who also back another referendum – mean there is a majority for such a vote in the Scottish Parliament.
READ MORE: 'UK not ignoring human rights abuses in Saudi Arabia' says Chancellor
Blackford said: “We fought an election last year, which the SNP won, we now have an agreement with the Greens, there’s a majority for independence.”
Pringle however cautioned that pushing to hold a vote by the end of next year could result in the SNP’s goal of increasing support for independence being “undermined”.
He said: “A referendum is a means to an end, nothing more. If the Scottish Government pursues it within a tight 2023 timescale that people are uncomfortable with, even assuming it doesn’t happen then, the task of building support for independence itself may be undermined.”
Pringle said the “mandate” SNP and Green MSPs were elected on last May was to hold a referendum in the current five-year Scottish Parliament term.
Blackford insisted that the conflict in Ukraine should not delay plans for indyref2
With four years still to go, he added: “That provides time enough to get it right.”
Pamela Nash, chief executive of the pro-UK campaign group Scotland in Union, said: “Any sensible politician knows that this is not the time to be pursuing constitutional division and pulling Scotland apart.”
She said Blackford is “rowing back on his previous comments to appease a minority who want to continue the nationalist campaign to leave the UK”.
READ MORE: US adds firm registered in Scotland to Russian sanctions list
Nash said: “respected observers like Kevin Pringle recognise there shouldn’t be another referendum next year”.
She added: “At this difficult time, we need politicians working to unite communities, not stoking fresh division.”
It comes as a poll by Savanta ComRes found that 59% of respondents felt talks on the timing of a second referendum should stop during the Ukraine war, compared to 29% who believed they should continue.
And, Prime Minister Boris Johnson used his speech at the Scottish Tory party conference to say now is not the time for an independence referendum.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel