LEGISLATION to hold a second independence referendum using Holyrood powers is to be introduced into the Scottish Parliament soon, according to the Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie.
Harvie, who is also a minister in the Scottish Government, underlined that it was still the administration's plan to hold a vote on the country's future next year despite the invasion of Ukraine.
Asked by The Herald when the bill will be laid before MSPs, he said: "I think there will be an announcement on that before too long. I don't think a date has absolutely been fixed.
"There are one or two hoops the Scottish Government has to jump through before formally laying a bill like submitting it to the Presiding Officer.
"But the bill itself will be fairly short and simple actually as the last parliament already passed framework legislation for referendums.
"So we don't actually need a big and substantive a bill as we had for the last one because we already have all of that framework legislation in place.
"So you will hear before very long what the timescale is for that but it will be fully in line with the intention to hold an independence referendum in the timescale that we promised."
Earlier this week the SNP's Westminster leader Ian Blackford suggested there could be a delay to Indyref2 in wake of the war in Ukraine.
But Harvie said: "Obviously the events of the next few weeks may determine whether this is a crisis that is de-escalated or one which becomes that much more dangerous and much more protracted European war that we all want to avoid.
"We want to do everything we can, of course, to argue for de-escalation and to try and make that successful."
"We want to do everything we possibly can - more than the UK Goverrnment has done so far - to support the people fleeing that crisis in the biggest humanitarian crisis Europe has seen since the Second World War.
"So obviously there are really urgent issues to address there and to try and do everything we can do to work with our international partners to achieve that."
He added: "But I don't think that everything else that the Scottish Government has promised to do between now and 2026 needs to be put on hold. We have a great deal of other work, whether that is the heat and building work, commitments on biodiversity...or indeed whether it is the promise that we made to the people of Scotland to give them the choice about their own constitutional future.
"I don't think we should shelve the rest of the Scottish Government's programme, including this question."
Pressed whether the Holyrood Referendum Bill would be introduced before the Easter recess which begins on April 2, he said: "I don't think a date has been absolutely fixed at the moment. You have to go through some pre-introduction stages before you lay a bill in Holyrood ... I don't think you will have long to wait."
Earlier this week Nicola Sturgeon said she still hopes to hold an independence referendum next year.
But in an interview with LBC, when the First Minister was asked whether the current geopolitical situation had impacted her thinking on the referendum in 2023, she replied: “My plans and my thinking hasn't changed.”
Sturgeon added: “We, right now, should be reminded, above all else, how lucky we are to live in a free democracy where we can put forward our case for political constitutional change, argue that case passionately, whatever our views on that might be, and trust people to decide.
“I support independence for a whole variety of reasons, but one of the motivations for my support for independence is to see Scotland play a bigger role, albeit as a small country, in building a more peaceful world, to be a progressive, constructive international partner, to be a progressive country that welcomes refugees.
"And sees Scotland as a place of sanctuary, a country that sees the benefits we stand to gain from having people come here and make a contribution to our society. And, actually, all of these issues right now, I think are brought into sharp focus by the tragedy that is unfolding in Ukraine.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel