THE boss of Shell pocketed a £1.1 million pay rise last year after the business reported a record profit that led to strong calls for a windfall tax on the sector.
Ben van Beurden took home 7.4m euros (£6.3m), up from 5.8m euros (£5.2m) a year earlier, the company revealed on Thursday.
The chief executive took an income hit during Covid, and his total remuneration is still lower than before the pandemic. It is also far below the £17.2m that he made in 2018.
The business has been helped by rapidly rising energy prices in recent months.
Gas prices doubled between 2020 and 2021, the business revealed.
READ MORE: FMQs: Nicola Sturgeon rejects plea to 'deal a blow' to Putin with oil production
Meanwhile the average price of Brent crude oil increased from 42 to 71 dollars (£31.90 to £53.93) per barrel.
A month ago, Shell said this led to a 14-fold increase in profit last year.
The company would have struggled to choose a worse day for the announcement – later in the day energy regulator Ofgem announced a 54% hike in energy bills for the average UK household.
It led to calls for a windfall tax on Shell and its rival BP from many senior politicians.
Van Beurden said that a “small player” like Shell could not itself influence the price of energy much.
“On one hand, we see a booming market, particularly for gas, but also for oil. But at the same time, we are struggling as an industry to keep up with supply,” he told reporters on Thursday.
Since last month, Russia has invaded Ukraine in an unprovoked attack. This has further pushed up gas prices to record levels, while the cost of oil has edged towards its 2008 peak.
READ MORE: FMQs: Holyrood leaders condemn Vladimir Putin as war criminal
For Shell, it has meant difficult decisions, and the oil giant has promised to stop doing business in Russia.
It will pull out of oil and gas projects, shut petrol stations and end its aviation fuels business in the country.
“We will go ahead with these steps, regardless of their financial implications, while doing everything we can to support our staff in Russia,” van Beurden said in an annual report released on Thursday.
The company said it had set up a crisis group to deal with the situation.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel