A JUDGE has given the go ahead for sex abuse survivors to launch a multi-million pound US-style ‘class action’ lawsuit against Celtic FC.
Lord Arthurson gave permission on Tuesday for 22 former Celtic Boys Club players to launch a compensation claim against the Parkhead club.
The judge gave the ruling after being addressed on Monday by advocate Ian Mackay QC. He represents men who were abused whilst playing for the youth side and they believe that they are entitled to compensation.
READ MORE: Ex-Celtic star Paddy McCourt protests innocence in court appearance on sex charge
Mr Mackay told Lord Arthurson that the two entities were “intimately connected” to each other - a claim denied by Celtic FC who say the two organisations were separate from each other.
On Tuesday, Lord Arthurson said that the legal criteria for allowing the action to proceed had been met.
He said: “Having considered parties’ position on the supposed permission application, I am satisfied that the relevant criteria in granting this application has been established and I can exercise my discretion to grant the application.
“The averments which the pursuers offer to prove set out a background in respect that each was a player with Celtic BC when they were subject to sexual assaults and when they were under the supervision and control of these individuals.”
Lord Arthurson spoke during a virtual hearing of the Court of Session in an action in which 22 former players have came forward seeking compensation for being sexually assaulted whilst playing for Celtic Boys Club.
They have brought “group proceedings” against Celtic FC PLC - the procedure is similar to US class action style litigations.
On Monday, Mr Mackay told Lord Arthurson that lawyers for the men have uncovered evidence which shows apparent close links between Celtic Boys Club and Celtic FC.
He said the evidence showed that the two entities were “intimately connected” and that his clients should be allowed to sue Celtic.
Mr Mackay said: “Celtic Boys Club was intimately connected to Celtic Football Club - it was branded as being closely connected to Celtic Football Club.
READ MORE: Campaigners to walk from Glasgow to Edinburgh over football gambling adverts
“Players played in Celtic strips and wore blazers which were virtually identical to those worn by Celtic FC players.
“Football kit, holdalls and training gear were provided by Celtic Football Club.
“The pursuers’ understanding was that they were playing for the boys club of Celtic Football Club.
“Celtic Boys Club trained at Barrowfield, the training ground of Celtic Football Club and Celtic Park as well as elsewhere.
“Celtic Football Club exercised control over who played for Celtic Boys Club because scouts recruited players who they considered were good enough to play for Celtic Football Club and diverted them to Celtic Football Club.
“The Boys Club was a nursery for senior team players. Celtic Boys Club was in effect what could be now known as the academy of Celtic Football Club.
“Articles about Celtic Boys Club appeared regularly in the Celtic View, the club’s newspaper - and the club was referred to as being part of the Celtic family.
“Celtic is vicariously liable for assaults.”
Roddy Dunlop QC, for Celtic FC, told Lord Arthurson that the action shouldn’t be allowed to proceed.
He said his clients believed they wouldn’t get a “fair trial” because documents which would be key to their case that they boys club and Celtic FC were different entities were missing.
On Tuesday, Lord Arthurson said the issues being faced by Celtic were not so great as to force the action to stop.
Lord Arthurson also passed a court order prohibiting the identification of the people who have brought the legal action.
He added: The common issue in the proceedings is the question of the vicarious liability of the defenders for the actions of these individuals.
The court accordingly grants the permission application.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article