A METROPOLITAN Police sergeant who kissed the cheek of a female officer has avoided the sack, after a misconduct panel ruled he should instead face a reduction in rank.
Sergeant George Panayi, 48, part of the East Area Command Unit, was accused of kissing and pinching the cheek of the female officer – without her consent – while on duty.
He was also accused of opening the door to a lavatory knowing the female officer was inside.
Chairwoman of the police misconduct panel Eileen Herlihy said: “We find that all three allegations are proven as misconduct.”
She described his actions as “offensive” and pointed out that he was “superior in rank”.
READ MORE: Cressida Dick quits as head of London Met after confrontation with Sadiq Khan
Regarding the kiss on the cheek, Herlihy said: “We find the officer’s behaviour is entirely unprofessional.”
Delivering his sanction, she said: “The most appropriate and proportionate outcome is reduction in rank.”
The rationale for the police misconduct panel’s decision was not given and is expected at a later date.
Earlier, Julian Walters, counsel for the Appropriate Authority, had said “the only real option is dismissal without notice”.
On Monday, the female officer told the hearing she was sitting in the driver’s seat of a police van on December 21 2019 when Sgt Panayi approached and asked to see the logbook.
She said he showed her photographs of women on his phone and told her: “I’m dating them because you are not available.”
After that, she said he grabbed her face “in a headlock” with both hands and kissed her on the cheek.
She said he grabbed her in such a way that she “couldn’t move”.
The officer was asked by Walters: “Had you consented to this?”
She replied: “Absolutely not.”
The woman said the incident was “offensive, demeaning, horrifying”, adding: “I was shocked. I did not know how to react.”
She said she was “like a fish out of water” and was not sure what to do, adding: “It was unwanted. It was offensive.”
Walters said if the incident unfolded as the female officer had described, it was a “slam-dunk case for harassment”.
Sgt Panayi told the hearing this week that it was not uncommon for him to kiss colleagues on the cheek when congratulating them on a promotion, greeting them after a long absence or when having “a bit of fun” with them.
He said: “There’s a cultural side to it, me being from a Mediterranean Greek origin.
“I am quite a touchy person when it comes to showing some kind of feeling or emotion.”
But he admitted “on reflection, I was stupid”.
He added: “I regret my actions and I admit that I’ve been a little bit naive in my behaviour.
“I am aware of how the culture has moved since 2019 and I have changed considerably.”
The woman told the hearing that on February 3 2020, Sgt Panayi also pinched her cheek when she was in the middle of restraining a mental health patient trying to self-harm.
She said it was “completely unprofessional”, adding: “He didn’t do it to my other colleague. He did it to me.”
READ MORE: Cressida Dick quits: Priti Patel hits out at 'rude and unprofessional' Sadiq Khan
The woman told the hearing about the third allegation, said to have taken place on February 9 2020, in which she says Sgt Panayi opened the female lavatory door after she had gone in and before she had the chance to lock it.
“He just laughed at me and walked off,” she said.
The officer said she reported the incidents as they had not been one-offs.
“This was becoming a pattern. My fear was that other things were going to happen,” she said.
The officer said there had been “stigma” after she made the allegations, adding some colleagues were supportive while others were not.
It was alleged that Sgt Panayi breached the standards of professional behaviour in respect of authority, respect and courtesy.
The panel did not believe there was any sexual motivation behind Sgt Panayi’s behaviour.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel