Facebook’s parent company Meta has been fined for a second time by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) for breaching an initial enforcement order from the watchdog.
The CMA said it had fined Meta £1.5 million after it failed to alert the regulator in advance of key staff leaving the company while an investigation into a merger is taking place.
The CMA launched an investigation into Meta’s proposed purchase of GIF-sharing platform Giphy in June 2020.
The technology giant said it was “disappointed” by the decision and called the fine “problematic” because it said it related to the “voluntary departure of US-based employees”.
It is standard practice for the CMA to issue an initial enforcement order at the start of an investigation into a completed merger as they are designed to make sure the companies involved continue to compete with one another as they would have before the deal took place, and also prevents the companies from integrating further while a merger review is under way.
It is the second time Meta has been fined for breaching an initial enforcement order – in October 2021, the tech giant was fined more than £50 million by the CMA for significantly limiting the scope of compliance reports which were a part of the watchdog’s investigation into the Giphy purchase.
The CMA has since ruled that Meta’s purchase of Giphy could harm social media users and UK advertisers, and has told Meta to sell Giphy in its entirety.
Explaining the latest fine, Joel Bamford, senior director of mergers at the CMA, said: “Meta failed to alert us in advance to important changes in their staff, despite knowing they were legally required to do so. This is not the first time this has happened.
“Initial enforcement orders are an integral part of our mergers toolkit and ensure the CMA is able to take effective action if we find competition concerns.
“Breaches like this one threaten our ability to maintain the benefits of competition for people using these products and services.”
In response, a Meta spokesperson said: “We are disappointed by the CMA’s decision to fine us because of the voluntary departure of US-based employees.
“We intend to pay the fine, but it is problematic that the CMA can take decisions that could directly impact the rights of our US employees protected under US law.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here