
BORIS Johnson's fate remains up in the air as MPs anxiously await the publication of an internal report into parties on Downing Street.
The report by senior civil servant Sue Gray could be pivotal for the Prime Minister’s leadership but it has yet to be submitted to No 10, with legal and human resources officials scrutinising it before it can be sent to Downing Street for publication.
The announcement of a Scotland Yard investigation into some of the alleged lockdown-busting parties in No 10 and Whitehall, based in part on the evidence uncovered in the Gray inquiry, is thought to have complicated the process, with police and officials keen to avoid releasing anything which could prejudice a criminal case.
With no clear indication of when Gray’s findings will be delivered to his office, the Prime Minister was continuing with his diary events rather than waiting for the report to arrive. The latest reports suggest the dossier may not be delivered until early next week.
He was pictured leaving Downing Street for scheduled engagements away from London early on Thursday.
Johnson is also contending with a fresh scandal over his involvement in the evacuation of animals from Afghanistan.
With the majority of Tory MPs waiting for the report before passing their own judgment on the party leader, allies of the Prime Minister rallied around him.
Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries became the second Cabinet minister to make the contested claim that ousting the Prime Minister could trigger a General Election.
Such threats are intended to leave many Tory MPs, particularly those in the Red Wall of former Labour heartlands won in Johnson’s 2019 landslide, nervous about keeping their seats.
There is no requirement for a new leader to hold a general election, but Dorries said previous handovers, such as Tony Blair to Gordon Brown, had taken place in “different times”.
She tweeted: “Blair as example of why we won’t need GE is wrong. It was yonks ago Blair to Brown smooth pre announced handover, no leadership election.
“Brown was still pressured to go, bottled it and then lost. V different times pre rolling 24hr news / social media.”
Blair as example of why we won’t need GE is wrong. It was yonks ago Blair to Brown smooth pre announced handover, no leadership election. Brown was still pressured to go, bottled it and then lost.
— Nadine Dorries (@NadineDorries) January 27, 2022
V different times pre rolling 24hr news / social media.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson DID intervene to airlift animals from Afghanistan, emails show
Her comments echoed Jacob Rees-Mogg, the Commons leader, who said the UK now had “essentially a presidential system”, so any new leader would need their own mandate from the electorate.
In reality, there is little precedent for this approach. John Major, Gordon Brown and Theresa May have all become prime minister without calling an immediate election.
Johnson is committed to making a Commons statement after receiving the report, but with the House due to finish sitting at 5pm on Thursday and no Government business scheduled on Friday that could push the timing of any address to MPs into next week.
Cabinet minister Therese Coffey said she did not know why the report into parties in Downing Street and Whitehall during the 2020 lockdowns was taking so long to produce.
“I know the Government has committed to publishing the full findings of the report but the timing I have absolutely know idea about,” she told Sky News.
Coffey added: “Have I ever been to any parties in Downing Street?
“The last party I recall going to at Downing Street was the celebration of when the UK left the European Union following the referendum.”
What's holding up the Sue Gray report?
— Kay Burley (@KayBurley) January 27, 2022
Here's the Work and Pensions Sec @theresecoffey 👇#KayBurley MR pic.twitter.com/V0SMniKstE
READ MORE: Boris Johnson makes nasty joke about SNP MP Ian Blackford's weight at PMQs
If the outcome of the Gray report is significantly damaging, Johnson could face a revolt from his own MPs, who may choose to call a vote of no confidence.
The Daily Mail reported that Tories were urging the PM to scrap a planned hike in national insurance to win back their support.
The Commons Treasury Committee warned in a report released on Thursday that the rise in employer national insurance contributions would contribute to a rise in inflation.
Conservative MP for Bolton North East Mark Logan said that while Mr Johnson had his support, there needed to be a reset.
He told Sky News: “There has to be a huge change. There has to be a change of heart with the Prime Minister, there has to be a change of approach and a whole change to the infrastructure around the Prime Minister.”
Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng meanwhile denied reports he was against the national insurance rise, as he told ITV’s Peston: “We’ve had a settled Cabinet position.”
He added: “We’re all committed to the national insurance rise because that’s the best way… to fund the huge amounts of money that we need to make sure that we clear the backlog from the coronavirus in the NHS, and also, we can put our social care, health and social care, on a good footing.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel