Lucky genes can help protect people with obesity from certain diseases, a new study suggests.
These people tend to have their fat stored under their skin rather than on their organs.
Scientists say the findings explain why some obese people remain relatively healthy, while others suffer from life-changing conditions like type 2 diabetes and heart disease.
While anyone with a body mass index (BMI) over 30 is considered obese, two people with the same BMI can have very different amounts of fat, and that fat can be distributed in different places throughout the body.
Fat stored under the skin, like a paunch or a double chin, is considered less harmful than fat stored around organs such as the liver and heart.
And according to researchers, the genes people are born with determine how and where this fat is stored.
Dr Hanieh Yaghootkar, a lecturer in biosciences at Brunel University London – who led the research, said: “Some people have unlucky fat genes, meaning they store higher levels of fat everywhere, including under the skin, liver and pancreas.
“That’s associated with a higher risk of diseases such as type 2 diabetes.
“Others are luckier and have genes that mean higher fat under the skin but lower liver fat and a lower risk of diseases like type 2 diabetes.”
Of the 37 diseases the team tested, 12 – including coronary artery disease, stroke and type 2 diabetes – were directly related to the genes which determine where the fat is stored.
The study also found that nine of the conditions could be said to be unrelated to this and were most likely a result of simply carrying too much weight, such as having deep vein thrombosis or arthritic knees.
But the researchers warn that regardless of where someone stores their fat, being obese is a serious hazard to a person’s health.
They also found some other diseases previously thought to be related to someone’s weight, such as Alzheimer’s, appear to be unconnected.
Dr Yaghootkar said: “To better prevent and measure risk of disease, it is important to understand if obesity is a casual risk factor and if it is causal, which consequences of it – be they metabolic, mechanical or psychological – are deriving the risk.
“Our results also provide evidence that everyone will benefit from losing their extra fat even if they are metabolically healthy.”
The researchers hope doctors will be able to use the study results to determine if they should be targeting the adverse effects of someone’s obesity, or be trying to get them to shed a few pounds.
Timothy Frayling, professor of human genetics at the University of Exeter, said: “For example, there are many treatments that can lower the high-fat levels in the blood and around the organs that do not affect the extra weight a person carries.
“In contrast, for other conditions, it may be more important to reduce the extra weight as much as, or more than, the damaging high sugar and fat levels in the blood.”
The study, published in the journal eLife and funded by Diabetes UK, used data from Finland’s FinnGen project and the UK Biobank database, which collected information from 500,000 individuals aged 37 to 73 between 2006 and 2010 from across the UK.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here