MPS’ security costs increased by nearly a third last year and could rise further following the fatal stabbing of Sir David Amess, a watchdog has revealed.
The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) said the amount stood at £4.4 million for the financial year 2020/21, up from £3.4m in 2019/20.
Overall, MPs’ business costs amounted to nearly £138m in 2020/21, IPSA said.
Both staffing and office costs also rose by 17% on the previous year, to £105.8m and £15.2m respectively, according to the regulator.
IPSA chair Richard Lloyd said spending on staffing was higher as the budget was boosted in light of constituency casework increasing to record levels.
Meanwhile, travel and subsistence costs – which include funding to cover staff and dependants – dropped by more than 60%, from £5.6m in 2019/20 to £2.1m in 2020/21.
Lloyd said this reflected “different working patterns”.
READ MORE: This is how much money Boris Johnson wasted on Scotland to NI bridge plan study
The IPSA chair said security costs, which rose by 29% last year, “could increase further” following the death of Sir David in October.
The Conservative MP for Southend West was fatally stabbed during a constituency surgery in Leigh-on-Sea.
Lloyd added that compliance with the IPSA rules remained “very high”, at 99.7%.
“As the independent regulator that oversees spending by MPs, we can confirm today that compliance with our rules remained very high during the Covid pandemic,” he said.
“By far the largest area of spending is to pay for the salaries of MPs’ staff. These are people who work long hours to help constituents, often dealing with very difficult issues.
“In the last financial year, MPs and their staff changed how they work to provide their constituents with a service during the pandemic. This is reflected in some of the spending details we have published today.
“We enabled MPs’ staff to work from home, while the amount spent on parliamentary business travel fell to reflect different working patterns.
“Overall spending on staffing was higher as the budget was increased to better support constituents when casework increased to record levels.”
He added: “Security spending has also increased in the last year, and could increase further this year [following the death of Sir David in October]. Keeping MPs, their families, and their staff safe is absolutely vital for our democracy.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here