THE electoral strategy consultants can pack up their bags, commentators put down their pens.
The question that has haunted the English left for more than a decade - "how did we end up in this mess" - has been answered, finally.
One man bears the responsibility for the abject failure of the UK Labour party to get anything right in the past 12 years...
He is Neil Findlay.
Or at least, that's according to Comrade Findlay.
In an interview in the Scottish Left Review, Neily credits himself with the bright idea of losing elections as a key plank of Labour's strategy.
Auld Findo took it upon himself to say that Corbyn's inspired strategy of losing two elections to an utterly hopeless, divided and incompetent Tory party in 2017 and 2019, came from him.
Asked if his failed run against Jim "Who? Oh, aye mind him" Murphy in 2014 paved the way for Dicky Leonard taking the reigns and running the horse straight into third place - Findo gave a resounding "yes".
He said: "I am 100% convinced that had I not stood there would have been no Jeremy Corbyn as UK leader and no Richard Leonard as Scottish leader."
The former teacher said it was his lessons in the nobility of failure that took Labour into the political wilderness for the foreseeable.
It is not clear if Sir Keir has studied in the arts of Findlayism but the party's showing in the 2021 Hartlepool by-election suggests he may well have taken a leaf from Neily's Wee Red Book.
Findo then went even further to suggest that Corbyn's tactic of not winning the 2017 General Election and keeping Scottish Labour in third place had come directly from him.
He said: "We campaigned on a popular socialist agenda that enthused a new generation and brought back many who left us over issues like Iraq.
"When Labour defied the pundits in 2017 the establishment and media s*** themselves at the prospect of Labour victory at the next election and with the help of opponents within his own party they unleashed the hounds of hell on Corbyn and anyone and anything associated with the project."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel