TONY Blair wanted to explore the option of the Queen officially opening Northern Ireland’s new Assembly in 1998, newly released state papers reveal.
The then Labour prime minister was, however, concerned that it would be a “delicate issue” for nationalist opinion and asked one of his ministers to raise it privately with then SDLP deputy leader Seamus Mallon.
Then Northern Ireland secretary of state Mo Mowlam (below right) suggested that it might help “see off controversy” if ideas which did not necessitate the Queen’s involvement were considered.
Details are contained in documents held at the Public Record Office in Belfast. Hundreds of the files are now being opened for public viewing under the 30/20 year rule.
The Stormont Assembly was formally established in 1998, with the first election taking place in June and the first meeting in July.
However, the Assembly was to exist in shadow form without assuming full devolved powers until December 1999, mainly due to political disputes over IRA decommissioning of weapons.
Newly released papers reveal a letter from John Holmes, principal private secretary to Blair, to Nick Perry at the Northern Ireland Office (NIO) on September 21, 1998, when he raised the possibility of the Queen officially opening the Stormont parliament.
He writes: “The Prime Minister agrees that we cannot assume that this will remain a sleeping dog. However, he does not believe that it would be inappropriate for The Queen to open the Assembly and does not agree we should ourselves try to avert this possibility.
“Nevertheless, he recognises that this is a delicate issue for nationalist opinion.”
The letter adds: “He therefore believes that as a first step Paul Murphy (an NIO minister) should talk to Seamus Mallon privately about arrangements for the opening, mentioning the possibility of The Queen, but in neutral terms, before raising it with (David) Trimble or making any other moves.
“We can take it from there, depending on Seamus’s reaction.”
READ MORE: Unionists lack ‘sophistication’, Haughey told John Major in Downing Street meeting
A letter from Labour official Jonathan Stephens said he had had a meeting with Mo Mowlam on the issue.
He stated: “She was entirely content with the line being taken by No 10.
“But she also suggested that it might help see off controversy if we were ready to come forward ourselves with vibrant and exciting proposals for marking the devolution of full powers to the Assembly in a way which did not necessitate the Queen’s involvement – eg children’s choirs, etc.”
Attention then turns to the crisis which was engulfing the newly established Assembly over IRA decommissioning and the refusal of first minister David Trimble to agree to Sinn Fein joining the shadow executive until weapons had been put beyond use.
A letter from Holmes in September states: “Dr Mowlam explained her concern that positions were hardening on both sides over the impasse involving decommissioning and the formation of a shadow executive.
“Neither Trimble nor (then Sinn Fein president Gerry) Adams showed any signs of moving.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel