CHARLIE Haughey told Prime Minister John Major at a meeting in 1991 that he should not “attribute too much sophistication to the Unionists” amid ongoing efforts to bring The Troubles to a close.
The comments by the Taoiseach, recorded in an Irish government note of the meeting, were made in Downing Street on June 21 1991.
It came amid ongoing talks between the four main Stormont parties discussing the future of Northern Ireland.
Those talks, which became known as the Brooke/Mayhew talks after the incumbent Northern Ireland secretaries of state, were destined to end with little progress for a peace settlement.
Haughey, who would leave office several months later, indicated to Major he did not believe that the talks would produce anything of substance.
Instead, he told his British counterpart: “If we want to achieve something, we, the two governments, must take the whole situation by the scruff of the neck.
“The situation in Northern Ireland is a constant irritant in relations between the two governments.
“Nearly everywhere I go on the international scene, I am asked: ‘When are you going to solve the problem of Northern Ireland?’
“There are questions of international prestige at stake.
“There are great benefits for both of us in the world from a clearing of the decks. Both countries could then settle down to some sort of normal relations. I hope in all this I am not teaching my grandmother to suck eggs.”
READ MORE: John Major: Westminster should not block new Scottish independence referendum
Major tells the Irish premier: “The more I learn of the problem, the more anxious I am to make progress. I would favour a step-by-step approach – a slow approach. We have to carry a Unionist and nationalist consensus along.”
Haughey speaks of the need to get officials and experts to look at the possibility of Sinn Fein joining “the process”.
Later, Major expresses some concern about the feelings of Unionists, telling Haughey: “The whole subject is very difficult and very complex in view of the position of the Unionists – and of Northern Ireland generally.”
According to the confidential note, Haughey responded: “You don’t know your own strength in this. I must ask where do the Unionists have to go? If you say ‘The British Government have decided on a certain course of action’ where do they go?”
“If they push, things go back and the Anglo-Irish Agreement is fully in place and will be so for another 20 years.
“Don’t attribute too much sophistication and understanding to the Unionists. If the British Government says ‘This is the way we must go’, they have no alternative.
Major responds: “Whatever is proposed must be broadly accepted by the Unionists and also by Parliament.”
At one stage, Major tells the Irish leader that more cross-border co-operation is needed. Haughey replies that it is already “superb” and teases: “I think you are beginning to speak like Mrs Thatcher. Maybe you have one of her briefs.”
Haughey and Margaret Thatcher had an often difficult and antagonistic relationship throughout her time as British prime minister.
“We have bitten the bullet of extradition and the system is operating, despite some political trauma in the South. People concentrate on feelings and animosities in Northern Ireland but I have my own party to consider on this subject,” warns Haughey.
READ MORE: Ken Clarke: UK close to becoming an 'elected dictatorship' under Boris Johnson
The Irish leader says he was careful to “sell this an an EC [European Council] meeting”.
Major used the meeting to complain about recent media comments by Thatcher and former Conservative prime minister Edward Heath on European integration.
“Luxembourg and the community are causing a real fuss over here now,” the Prime Minister says.
“There are certain key words which inflame passions here. One of them is ‘federal union’.”
The record can be found in the National Archives with file number 2021/93/30
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel