BROADCASTERS face becoming irrelevant to audiences if they fail to act on climate change , media chiefs have warned.
Senior figures from the BBC, Channel 4, ITV, Sky and STV urged their competitors to create more content reflecting the realities of climate change during a panel coinciding with COP26.
It came after 12 of the UK’s major media brands agreed to increase the amount and improve the quality of their climate change storytelling across drama, comedy and daytime programming.
Simon Pitts, chief executive of STV, said there is a “commercial imperative” for broadcasters to make changes now.
READ MORE: COP26 LIVE: Day three of UN climate crisis summit in Glasgow
He told the panel: “In a couple of generations, when they look back not just on Covid but what we are doing now, we are not going to be judged on whether we managed to hit our quarterly targets and profit numbers – it is if we stepped up and did the right thing.
“This isn’t pure altruism, it is a commercial imperative for us. If we don’t do all the things we are discussing, we won’t be relevant to our audiences and, crucially, to our people.”
Channel 4 chief executive Alex Mahon said there is a “collective responsibility on us as CEOs because we are in a position of power, because we have the ability to put things in the media that influence consumer behaviour”.
She added: “You hear that in different ways from all of us. We have to look at the facts and what our responsibilities are as running businesses.
“But we are running particular businesses – so now we have cleaned up our own organisations over 10 years, as you have heard, the question is now ‘What can we do to influence the behaviour of the population?’ Because we have the ability to do that.
“We have to do it in the right way, in a way that is not lecturing or hectoring, but we can do that in a way that makes massive, massive impact on the UK.”
BBC director-general Tim Davie said climate change is no longer a “politically controversial” issue and the pledge does not affect the corporation’s impartiality.
He told the panel: “The overwhelming consensus is that we, as humanity, are causing global warming. There are voices on the fringes but, in my view, when it comes to due impartiality for the BBC, we are now at a point where we have consensus around that.
“But then you do get into political debate around policy, speed of change, the social consequences – there is tough stuff to debate and we will do that as the BBC.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon tells German news site that Scotland is 'paying for its dependence'
Dame Carolyn McCall, chief executive of ITV, said UK broadcasters can also influence their foreign commercial partners through their programmes.
“We are talking very much about the UK here, and that is right. But there is a point here that is all of our content travels and so we can have a influence worldwide,” she said.
The signatories to the pledge – who also include Britbox, Discovery and RTE – represent more than 70% of the time UK audiences spend watching TV and film.
The pledge was brought together by Albert, the screen industry organisation for environmental sustainability, and is being launched to coincide with the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow.
However, the companies have not set measurable targets and will announce their own commitments in the coming year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel