JEFF Bezos claimed that the earth’s atmosphere looks thin from above, but it can’t be as thin as his environmental credentials.
It’s beggars belief that the billionaire Amazon owner was invited COP26 in the first place.
But on Tuesday morning Bezos took to the stage in Glasgow, and barely waited more than a minute before mentioning that he had been to space this year in Blue Origin.
With all that cash behind him, doesn’t Bezos have any staffers with enough courage to tell him to read the room?
READ MORE: COP26: Spotlight on Scotland as Nicola Sturgeon interviewed by CNN's Christiane Amanpour
Looking wistfully out into the room, Bezos said: ”I was told that seeing the Earth from space changes the lens from which you view the world.
“But I was not prepared for just how much that would be true.
“Looking back at Earth from up there, the atmosphere seems so thin, the world so finite and so fragile.
“Now, in this critical year and what we all know is the decisive decade, we must all stand together to protect our world.”
Bezos took to the stage at COP26 in Glasgow
Ah yes, we must all come together, but does that include billionaires? Bezos's words are disconnected from his actions.
Sending a rocket into space in a climate emergency due to his own vanity is not protecting the planet, it's boosting his fragile ego.
Not only did he talk about going to space, burning excessive amounts of fuel in a phallic shaped rocket as part of his evident midlife crisis, he was giving a speech at an event about protecting forests.
Forests? Amazon? Does Bezos think that starting a Climate Pledge will rewrite history and the extensive irreversible damage his company has done will simply be forgotten?
READ MORE: Kelvingrove: VIP COP26 event sees Glasgow residents made to walk through unlit park
No, instead he pledged $2 billion for land reform in Africa, a plaster over a gaping wound.
Was he held to account for the increase of deliveries, drivers and vehicles on the road as a result of his company, the way this has shifted how we live our lives and had a disastrous impact on the planet? No.
Was he called out for the years of his firm using deforestation as part of the supply chain and using products stemming from it in the company’s packaging? No.
Were his links to big oil firms probed, or the size of the company’s carbon impact addressed? No.
He spoke about electric vehicles, and the funding he's given to some projects.
He was given over eight minutes to speak uninterupted, and the host thanked him for coming.
What a COP-out.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel