THE Finance Secretary says it is her “sincere hope” that strikes can be averted in the dispute over council workers’ pay, but said the matter is between local authorities and unions.
Kate Forbes said she would continue to encourage both sides to reach a deal to avoid industrial action in more than half of Scotland’s councils.
Workers in a number of different professions are set to strike during the COP26 summit, which takes place in Glasgow from next week.
School cleaning, catering, refuse and recycling workers are among those who could strike.
READ MORE: Scotland facing widespread strikes and environmental protests during COP26
At Holyrood today, Forbes responded to an urgent question from Scottish Labour MSP Mark Griffin.
He asked what the Scottish Government was doing to help in agreeing a pay deal acceptable to workers.
Griffin said: “Over half of local government workers earn below £25,000 a year and the current offer doesn’t even bring the lowest paid up to £10 per hour.”
He said the Scottish Government had intervened in pay negotiations for NHS workers and teachers despite not being their direct employers.
Forbes said the local government pay negotiations were between Cosla and the trade unions.
She said: “We have continued to do everything that we can to ensure that there is a fair settlement for local authorities despite the challenges of the pandemic and the constrained fiscal position.
“I will continue to engage and would hope that progress can be made to avert industrial action but also to ensure that there is a fair pay deal.”
READ MORE: UK Government official attacks COP26 mascot as 'king of the Glasgow rats'
Griffin then said the industrial action in November could be the beginning of a “long winter” of school closures and disruption to waste and recycling services.
Forbes said frontline workers were “critically important”, saying the Scottish public sector pay deal was “far fairer” than south of the Border.
She said: “I sincerely hope that a resolution is found through the SJC (Scottish Joint Council), which is obviously based on negotiations between the trade unions and Cosla.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here