PUPILS at Gordonstoun boarding school were “feral” and regularly showed racist and sexist behaviour, an inquiry has been told.
The Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry heard from a woman who attended the Moray school and its preparatory school Aberlour House in 1979 and the early 1980s.
The woman was referred to only as Jane to protect her anonymity.
She told Lady Smith’s inquiry that teachers at both schools showed a lack of boundaries which left her feeling unsafe, while pupils were often self-governing through the system of accommodation “houses”.
Jane said much of the accommodation at the Gordonstoun estate, which contains a grand 17th Century country house, was decrepit.
She said: “Like a lot of these establishments, the outside is a lie. The interior is squalid, particularly for the boys.”
Jane said pupils from Aberlour were always admitted to Gordonstoun despite failing the common entrance exam.
Children at Gordonstoun were “feral”, she said, recalling one incident where a boy was shot six times with an air rifle.
However, she said the only offence which would result in expulsion was having sex with another pupil, with children encouraged not to speak up.
READ MORE: Gordonstoun pupil was groped by physics teacher at school, inquiry hears
She said: “That was the cardinal sin, to speak. There was absolutely no way anyone would.”
Andrew Brown QC, counsel to the inquiry, asked her if misogyny was prevalent at the school.
Jane agreed, saying: “A lot of girls went out with considerably older boys to have protection.”
Describing “cruel” behaviour from boys at the school, she said she remembered them going on a “Jew hunt”.
Two girls from Africa who stayed in her house were left “very, very isolated”, she said.
She told the inquiry: “I feel very sad that I didn’t do anything about that.
“They would definitely say the racism was unliveable with.”
Jane said she tried to get herself expelled from the school but was unsuccessful.
Asked how she felt when she eventually left the school, she said: “I felt ruined”.
The latest phase of the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry is examining alleged abuse carried out in boarding schools.
The inquiry continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel