MINIMUM pricing for alcohol had little impact on drink-related crime in Scotland, a study has found.
Researchers at Manchester Metropolitan University analysed Police Scotland data for trends in alcohol-related crime, disorder and public nuisance after minimum unit pricing (MUP) was introduced in May 2018.
They found that these issues were declining before MUP and its introduction had no statistically significant impact on the trajectory.
The MUP base price is 50p per unit of alcohol. Campaigners are now calling for the base price to be raised to 65p per unit.
READ MORE: These are the Scottish council areas with the most Union flags
Public Health Scotland (PHS) has commissioned a number of other studies into the impact of MUP.
Earlier this year, a report found that people with alcohol dependencies consumed less cheap drink after the policy was introduced.
Another study for the Lancet Public Health journal found alcohol sales fell by nearly 8% after MUP began.
Jon Bannister, professor of criminology at Manchester Metropolitan University, said: “Whilst off-trade alcohol sales in Scotland fell following the introduction of minimum unit pricing, this study finds that reduction in sales had minimal impact on the levels of alcohol-related crime, disorder and public nuisance reported in Scotland.
“Drug-related crime appears to have been similarly unaffected, with no increase seen around the introduction of MUP.
There are a number of further studies underway into the impact of minimum pricing
“On the whole, the limited discernible impact of MUP on alcohol-related crime, disorder and public nuisance suggests that the reduction in off-trade alcohol sales that followed implementation is below that required to deliver a reduction in crime.
“Or, if crime did reduce, it has done so at a scale that the evaluation could not identify.”
Dr Karl Ferguson, an intelligence adviser at Public Health Scotland, said: “Understanding the impact of MUP on social harms including crime and public safety is an important aspect of the overall evaluation.
“The findings of this research are in line with previous Public Health Scotland studies which reported limited evidence of increased theft or illicit substance use as a result of MUP.
“These studies included research into how MUP affected small retailers, people drinking at harmful levels, and children and young people.”
READ MORE: Scotland v Israel: Tories slapped down over Hampden chaos claim
A number of further studies into the impact of MUP are under way, including looking at ambulance call-outs, hospital admissions and deaths, and the relationship between alcohol and illicit substance use.
In response to the latest report, Alison Douglas, chief executive of Alcohol Focus Scotland, called for the 50p price base to be raised.
She said: “It is disappointing that the study found limited impact on alcohol-related crimes as a result of MUP, especially given that MUP has been found to have reduced off-sales consumption in Scotland and early indications suggest it has also saved lives.
“However, it is well recognised that the effects of a 50p per unit minimum price will have been eroded by inflation since the policy was first approved by the Scottish Parliament in 2012.
“In order to ensure we get the most out of minimum unit pricing, Alcohol Focus Scotland believes the Scottish Government should increase the minimum price to at least 65p per unit.”
A Scottish government spokesperson said:"We will consider all relevant emerging evidence, including the impact of the pandemic on the economy, people's incomes and alcohol affordability.
"We are committed to ensuring we have an effective level of minimum unit price in place so we can reduce alcohol-related harms."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel