THE head of the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) has defended the security measures in jails after it emerged thousands of supposedly “unhackable” mobile phones given to prisoners are used to buy drugs and organise other crimes.
Teresa Medhurst told Holyrood’s Justice Committee that providing prisoners with mobiles to replace in-person visits during the pandemic had been a “learning process” but they were “aware of some of the areas of vulnerability”.
Approximately 7600 purportedly tamper-proof personal phones were issued to inmates by the Scottish Government at a cost of almost £3 million when prison visits were stopped because of coronavirus.
In an interview with ITN News, a prison officer at Barlinnie said that modified phones were being used to source drugs and organise deals.
John McTavish revealed that “very, very ingenious” inmates were able to tamper with the phones in a matter of hours, with approximately 100 of the 300 devices on one ward found to have been hacked.
The interim Scottish Prison Service head was unable to say how many phones had been compromised when asked by MSPs during yesterday’s evidence session. Stressing that the service was working with Police Scotland to attempt to stop drugs entering prisons, Medhurst suggested it was linked to serious organised crime groups “infiltrating” prisons with “ever more sophisticated” methods.
She told the committee: “We work with a range of experts and organisations to help us better understand the issue of selling drugs and the problem of drugs in prisons, as well as the measures we need to take in order to minimise those risks.”
Challenged by Jamie Greene MSP (below) about what will happen with the phones given to prisoners “knowing that many hundreds or perhaps thousands of them are being broken and used for illicit purposes”, Medhurst said the prison service was looking to introduce additional security measures.
She added: “We have security measures and that’s why we’re able to identify phones that have been tampered with.
“Where those phones have been tampered with, there are arrangements to ensure that we apply an appropriate degree of punishment and or withdrawal, depending on the circumstances and the nature of the tampering that has occurred.
“Going forward, what we need to do is ensure that any of those risks can be minimised and appropriate, additional measures put in place.”
Wendy Sinclair-Gieben, HM Inspectorate of Prisons for Scotland, said that despite staff being “phenomenal” at preventing many drugs getting in, she said: “Drugs in prison is a major, major issue.
“When I talk about revising the prison rules, one of the things that needs to happen is a reduction of the drugs coming in through the post in almost undetectable quantities.”
Sinclair-Gieben gave the example of forged letters from solicitors being soaked in psychoactive drugs, suggesting that all communication could instead be done electronically or photocopied.
“You’re always playing a catch-up game with drugs,” she said.
“It’s a major problem in prison, it’s a major problem stopping it coming in, and it’s a major problem providing support and rehabilitation to prevent people wanting to take drugs.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here