YOU have to go way back to, oh, the 1990s, to find a Speaker of the House of Commons obeying the dress code of that office which included a jabot, tights, breeches and buckled shoes. All part of the rich tradition of the Mother of Parliaments.
Alternatively a load of old sartorial cobblers to give blokes ideas above their station. (Betty Boothroyd bodyswerved most of that lot during her term. Even an ex-Tiller girl chooses where and when to allow a daring flash of lower leg.)
John Bercow (below) scrapped most of the rest, favouring a suit and bright tie under the kind of black robe which made him look rather like the headmaster of a fairly trendy comprehensive. He was, technically, a Tory. His successor, Lindsay Hoyle, is, technically a Labour chap. Yet this is the Speaker who has felt it necessary to issue a new dress code for the Commons.
No jeans, no chinos, smart shoes, jackets and ties for the boys, no off-the-shoulder number or big handbags for the gals. Doubtless he was motivated by 18 months of Zooming when, in addition to being able to check what rubbish folk really read, you could run the rule over their choice of knitwear.
All he seems to have achieved is making the House of Commons seem even more of a thoroughly dated talking shop than it already was, not to mention putting yet more visual barriers between the elected and those they are supposed to be serving.
I imagine most constituents are less exercised by how high the polish is on their MP’s shoes, than what the latter plan to do about the fact that they can’t afford proper footwear for the weans going back to school.
For myself, I’ve never figured out why men want to strangle themselves with ropes round the neck when there are so many great shirts around of the open necked variety. Give me a smart sports shirt over an egg-stained tie any old day.
READ MORE: Scots island stars in new TV series penned by Ian Rankin
My late and much lamented husband, being a cartoonist, felt tiewear was the ultimate joke and only had a mickey mouse one in silver and black for the kind of wedding where open necks would have upped the tutting count. (He did find one for the obligatory introductory meal with the matriarch, though admittedly it was narrow and leather. She coped.)
And if we’re talking respect for the privilege of being in the chamber, Lindsay old chap, what about that Rees Mogg eejit lounging along the front bench in a suit which looks like he nicked it from his grandad’s wardrobe.
From time to time MP’s manage to use their clobber to get a message firmly across: Caroline Lucas with her No More Page Three T-shirt, Hannah Bardell sporting a Scotland top (we were about to play England.) Harriet Harman also turned up a T-shirt with the legend “This is What a Feminist Looks Like”.
That noble gesture was somewhat diluted when Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband wore them too – though not in parliament – and the Mail on Sunday, was more interested in what the women making them were paid.
The bottom line is that people going to work in the Commons should wear what people going to work wear in other white-collar jobs. And these days, that means whatever looks most clean and reflects the temperature. Red faced and sweating in a suit is a poor sign of respect.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel