UK OFFICIALS and the Taliban are in talks over how to secure “safe passage” out of Afghanistan for British nationals and Afghan allies.
Downing Street confirmed Sir Simon Gass, the Prime Minister’s special representative for Afghan transition, has travelled to Qatar and is meeting with “senior Taliban representatives” to stress the importance of allowing people to leave Afghanistan.
The news emerged as the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) announced 15 crisis response specialists are being deployed to Pakistan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan to assist British diplomats in their work to allow people to escape Afghanistan over land borders and reach the UK.
The officials are expected to arrive within the next 48 hours, with the focus on helping UK nationals, interpreters and other Afghans who were employed by the UK, and those Afghans judged most at risk.
READ MORE: Dominic Raab does not deny there is a campaign to oust him as Foreign Secretary
Defence Secretary Ben Wallace has described the continuing evacuation efforts as “Dunkirk by WhatsApp”, with officials scrambling to contact Afghans who worked with the British military effort to help relocate them and their families.
Afghan resettlement minister Victoria Atkins gave few details away about the talks in Doha when asked if Sir Simon was yet to receive any assurance from the Taliban over guaranteeing safe passage for the Afghans left behind by Britain.
“Those talks are as I understand it ongoing and I’m not privy to it,” she told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
Atkins declined to give an update on the numbers of Afghans who the RAF were unable to airlift out of Kabul but Wallace has previously estimated that up to 1100 eligible Afghans would not be evacuated before the exit of foreign forces.
Elsewhere, the Home Office said Afghans who worked with the British government and military will be able to move to the UK permanently.
Former Afghan staff and their family members eligible for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap), which prioritises relocation to the UK for current or former locally employed staff who have been assessed to be under serious threat to life, will be given indefinite leave to remain as opposed to only five years’ temporary residency as previously permitted.
The number of UK nationals left behind in Afghanistan is in the “low hundreds”, Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said yesterday.
He was unable to give a “definitive” figure on how many Afghans the UK had failed to airlift to safety after the Taliban seized power as the US withdrew its final troops following a 20-year mission.
But in a further sign of the swift power shift in the region, Downing Street confirmed Sir Simon’s talks with the Taliban.
A No 10 spokesman said: “The Prime Minister’s special representative for Afghan transition, Simon Gass, has travelled to Doha and is meeting with senior Taliban representatives to underline the importance of safe passage out of Afghanistan for British nationals, and those Afghans who have worked with us over the past 20 years.”
MI6 chief Richard Moore held talks with the Pakistan military on Afghanistan in recent days, according to media reports in Pakistan.
The Daily Telegraph also reported secret discussions have taken place between senior British intelligence officials and the Taliban in Kabul in the past fortnight.
READ MORE: Brize Norton: Latest Afghan evacuation flight arrives in UK amid Kabul terror fears
The newspaper said the aim of the talks was to seek assurances that Afghanistan will not be used to launch terrorist attacks on the west.
This afternoon Raab will be quizzed by the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, with shadow foreign secretary Lisa Nandy insisting her counterpart has questions to answer on “much more than the chaos of the last two weeks”.
She said: “This has been the biggest foreign policy failing in a generation.
“The Foreign Secretary has serious questions to answer when he appears before the Foreign Affairs Committee.”
s Nandy added: “The Foreign Secretary had 18 months to prepare but was missing in action.
“As a result, on his watch Britain has become weaker in the world and faces greater risks from terrorism.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here