UK troops in Afghanistan have said they are facing challenges “nobody has experienced before”, as a former defence chief warned the Kabul airport evacuation is the “worst possible scenario”.
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) confirmed yesterday that seven Afghan civilians had died in the chaotic crowds outside the airport, while reports have suggested as many as 20 people have been killed in the past week while trying to get into the airfield.
The Operation Pitting rescue mission is being supported by 1000 British troops – including Paras from 16 Air Assault Brigade – with a further 1700 people repatriated in the 24 hours up to yesterday. Ministers are desperate for US president Joe Biden to keep American forces on the ground beyond his August 31 deadline, with Labour calling for the Prime Minister to phone the UK ally to extend the exit date.
READ MORE: 'Help Are Own First' fundraiser masterfully trolls social media users
Boris Johnson confirmed on social media that he will convene G7 leaders, which will include Biden, on Tuesday for “urgent talks” on the situation in Afghanistan.
In a statement, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said the group would discuss “continuing our close co-ordination on Afghanistan policy” as well as ongoing evacuation efforts.
Involved in that exercise is Lieutenant Colonel Justin Baker from 16 Air Assault Brigade, who is stationed at the passenger handling facility at Hamid Karzai airport. He said: “I think this is something that nobody has really experienced before, so we are facing challenges that nobody has experience for.”
Former chief of the defence staff Lord Richards said UK forces securing the air strip are in a “very precarious situation”, with little protection from security threats posed by the likes of so-called Islamic State.
“I’ve done a few of these non-combat evacuation operations in my time and this is the worst possible scenario, when you are unable to clear a space between the airhead and your possible threat, which is exactly what is happening now,” he told Times Radio.
“They are right on top of people and we’ve seen the tragic scenes coming out of Kabul airport, so it is not a good situation.”
Armed forces minister James Heappey said British troops are “seeing things that are unimaginably hard to deal with”, with reports of overcrowding and violence in the Kabul heat.
However, he said there have been “very encouraging” improvements at the Baron Hotel in Kabul, where Britons and Afghans eligible for repatriation are being processed, following reports earlier this weekend that it had been blockaded by the Taliban. He said the “flow” outside the hotel is “significantly” better following changes to crowd control by the militant regime, with 731 people processed for UK flights yesterday morning alone.
But the Afghan veteran echoed Defence Secretary Ben Wallace’s prediction that “absolutely nobody can say we’ll be able to get everybody out” as the UK presses for more time.
“The hard reality of complex, chaotic, dangerous situations like this is that simply may not be the case,” Heappey added.
He confirmed Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab has spoken to his opposite number, US secretary of state Antony Blinken, along with others in Washington to discuss extending the end-of-the-month deadline. The US decision to pull out of Afghanistan has seen senior politicians and security experts call for a “rethink” on British foreign policy.
Tobias Ellwood, Commons Defence Committee chair, said suggestions Britain had “not been included in the conversations” on the Afghan exit strategy shows there has been a “demise” in the “special relationship” between the UK and US.
Former national security adviser Lord Ricketts said the unfolding of events in the central Asian country had been “a humiliating period for the UK”. He told Times Radio: “We need to rethink a lot of that rhetoric in the integrated review published by the Government a few months ago about Britain as an ‘independent sovereign operator, turning the dial on international crises’.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel