THE Westminster Parliament will sit on Wednesday, August 18, after being recalled by Boris Johnson amid reports that Taliban fighters have entered the outskirts of the Afghan capital, Kabul.
With the country on the brink of complete collapse, the lead elements of the British force sent to evacuate the remaining UK nationals were understood to be in the city amid fears it could fall within days or hours.
In a sign of the speed of the collapse, arrangements were reportedly being made to fly the British ambassador Laurie Bristow out of the country.
It had previously been intended that Bristow should remain in a secure location at Kabul airport along with other international diplomats.
READ MORE: Afghan former British Army interpreter facing death after UK refuses him entry
But amid a hurried scramble for safety, countries were hurriedly removing their embassy staff, as helicopters were seen landing at the US embassy to ferry away remaining personnel.
In the UK, there was deep anger among many MPs at the way – 20 years after the first international forces entered Afghanistan – the country was being abandoned to its fate.
READ MORE: David Pratt: 20 years on the roles have reversed in Afghanistan
The chairman of the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee Tom Tugendhat said it was "the biggest single foreign policy disaster" since Suez, while Defence Committee chairman Tobias Ellwood said it was a humiliation for the West.
Labour leader Keir Starmer said ministers needed to explain what they intended to do to avert a looming humanitarian crisis and prevent Afghanistan again becoming a base for international terrorism.
"The situation in Afghanistan is deeply shocking and seems to be worsening by the hour," he said.
"The immediate priority now must be to get all British personnel and support staff safely out of Kabul. The Government has been silent while Afghanistan collapses which, let's be clear, will have ramifications for us here in the UK."
Despite the decision of the Biden administration to withdraw the remaining US troops which triggered the collapse, Ellwood said it was still not too late to turn the situation around.
He called for the despatch of the Royal Navy carrier strike group to the region and urged the Prime Minister to convene an emergency conference of "like-minded nations" to see what could be done.
"I plead with the Prime Minister to think again. We have an ever-shrinking window of opportunity to recognise where this country is going as a failed state," he told Times Radio.
"We can turn this around but it requires political will and courage. This is our moment to step forward.
"We could prevent this, otherwise history will judge us very, very harshly in not stepping in when we could do and allowing the state to fail."
Earlier Defence Secretary Ben Wallace said that when the US announced its plans to withdraw, he had approached other allies about taking their place but none was willing to do so.
Writing in The Sunday Telegraph, he said it was "arrogant" to think the UK – which is also pulling out its troops – could resolve the situation unilaterally.
"A unilateral force would very quickly be viewed as an occupying force and, no matter how powerful the country that sends it, history shows us what happens to them in Afghanistan," he said.
Britain is sending 600 troops – including Paras from 16 Air Assault Brigade –on a mission to support the final departure of the remaining UK nationals as well as Afghans who worked with the UK in the country.
Wallace had previously indicated that they could be there until the end of the month, but given the speed of the collapse that would appear unlikely.
Tugendhat, who served as an Army officer in Afghanistan, said the priority had to be to get as many people out before Kabul collapsed.
"This isn't just about interpreters or guards. This is about those people who we trained in special forces to serve alongside us, those who helped us to understand the territory through our agencies and our diplomats," he told BBC News.
"This is the people who, on our encouragement, set up schools for girls. These people are all at risk now.
"The real danger is that we are going to see every female MP murdered, we are going to see ministers strung up on street lamps."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel