BORIS Johnson has been branded selfish and out of touch as it was revealed nearly £100,000 was spent on two works of art to be displayed on the walls of 10 Downing Street.
The accounts of the Government's Art Collection fund show £70,200 was spent on a painting by Belfast artist Cathy Wilkes, the Daily Mirror reported.
A further £18,775 was spent on a set of works by photographer and installation artist Willie Doherty.
The works were paid for through the Government Art Collection fund, which is largely made up of contributions from donors but is supplemented by taxpayer cash.
The spending drew criticism from opposition MPs, who branded the works an unnecessary luxury when the Government is cutting “lifeline” benefits and furlough payments.
Labour MP Neil Coyle tweeted: "As his Government cuts Universal Credit and freezes frontline nurse/police pay, Johnson has found more money to treat himself. Again.
"He could not be more out of touch."
READ MORE: Boris Johnson ‘living it up like a modern-day Louis XVI’ in Downing Street flat
Colleague Emma Lewell-Buck told the Mirror: "The selfishness of this Prime Minister is galling.
"When shelves are bare in my local food banks, businesses have gone to the wall, public sector and key workers have suffered pay freezes and cuts, his priority is once again himself."
A Government spokeswoman defended the spending, commenting: "The Government Art Collection helps to promote the creativity of British art and culture by showcasing its works in the UK and across the globe.
"It acquires new works after consulting and securing the approval of an independent expert panel, and the majority of funding for acquisitions comes from philanthropic sources - not taxpayers' money.
"The Government Art Collection is committed to public engagement and lends extensively to public exhibitions and collaborates with public facing national events and through its digital platforms."
It is understood the two works were purchased to mark the centenary of the foundation of Northern Ireland.
Former culture secretary Ed Vaizey, now a Tory peer, also supported the purchases, saying: "Govt art collection has supported British artists for 120 years - a unique cultural asset for our country."
He added: "(Boris Johnson) would have had no involvement in acquisition, which wld have come from existing budget."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel