ANONYMOUSLY marked exam papers are still the best way of guaranteeing consistent standards in Scottish schools, a group of experts has said.
The future of the exams system is in question following the decision to scrap the last two exam diets due to the pandemic.
The Scottish Government is due to make a decision this month on whether next year’s exams will go ahead.
Ahead of this, the Commission on School Reform, which is led by Dr Keir Bloomer, has published a paper titled Exams – Do We Need Them?
It concluded that while coursework is an important part of the assessment system, anonymously marked exams remain the best way of guaranteeing that standards are consistent and results are equitable between different social groups.
The paper said a system based purely on teacher judgment could result in unintentional bias for or against certain social groups, such as a “halo effect” around affluent pupils who have previously performed well.
Bloomer said: “Examinations are not good at everything. Coursework can assess skills and understanding that examinations cannot.
“However, the experience of exam cancellations over the last couple of years tells us all we need to know about the important role that exams play in ensuring quality, consistent marking, and equity across the social divide.
“They test memory and focus, and teach young people how to consolidate knowledge over short periods of time, which are important and useful skills for life and work.”
Bloomer continued: “Furthermore, anonymous marking is effectively insurance against the sort of rapid grade inflation that ultimately only ends when every pupil returns straight As, which would do no favours to either individual pupils or the country as a whole.
“If Scotland were to scrap exams altogether, as some wish, it would put us out of step with the rest of the world, which increasingly relies on a hybrid model of coursework and exams. That should be our future, too.”
In December last year, the International Council of Education Advisers recommended scrapping “out-of-date” high school examinations and replacing them with continuous assessment.
They said the pandemic had exposed the underlying problems with exams such as National 5, Highers and Advanced Highers.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here