WHEN walking in the hills you are always told not to lose height if at all possible, as regaining it is much more exhausting. This is the mistake the SNP is making in the long trek towards independence.
John Drummond on Sunday describes convincingly that the SNP is committed to providing a written constitution which, if put in train, would make clear their commitment to the various rights which would become law in a new Scottish state (Democracy is dead in the United Kingdom – let’s ensure it endures in an independent Scotland, Jul 25). This in turn could easily be done now, as much work has already been done and it is a process which would involve all Scots.
READ MORE: Democracy is dead in the UK – let’s ensure it endures in an independent Scotland
The formal publishing of a constitution would be likely to reassure swithering voters and is more important than setting out a 10-year financial plan. Such financial plans are analagous to stepping on to scree or snowdrift, losing your footing on the shifting material and sliding downwards.
George Kerevan steps on such a surface on Monday when his article gives Kate Forbes a choice between two 10-year plans (Here is why our Finance Secretary needs at least two 10-year plans, Jul 26).
READ MORE: George Kerevan: Finance Secretary needs more than one 10-year economic plan
The Scottish Government does not have a mandate to choose between these courses, having been elected to gain independence. The proposal that we should wait for the outcome of our efforts for ten years is horrifying and should never be considered, for this is what such a plan over such a period implies. We should not give them even a hint of acceptance of such a possibility, when the resolution of all our problems depends on independence.
If my fellow supporters of freedom will forgive the specification, sheep paths always take the easiest route across the hill, but always progress steadily from one contour to another and never go straight down, which the SNP is doing at the moment.
Iain WD Forde
Scotlandwell
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel