JOURNALISTS are not the focus of a probe into how CCTV footage of Matt Hancock kissing his top aide was leaked to the press, investigators have said.
The former health secretary resigned from the Cabinet after footage published by the Sun newspaper showed him embracing Gina Coladangelo in his departmental office, in breach of Covid-19 rules.
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has faced criticism over a raid on two homes in the south of England where it seized computer equipment, as it investigates an alleged data breach relating to the incident.
The Sun called the raids an "outrageous abuse" that could deter whistleblowers from coming forward.
Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham told the PA news agency that the regulator has a "statutory responsibility" to investigate reports of a data breach "administering the laws that Parliament has given us".
"I'm also passionate about free journalism, the importance of an independent press and I'm also passionate about whistleblowers," she said.
"But whistleblowers and the public interest turns on us establishing the facts in this case, so it's important that we go in and we look at the facts and only then will we make a determination as to whether this data breach was in the public interest.
"You know, from the other side of the equation there is a lot of concern in the security community and among the public that their personal information collected on CCTV is used for security purposes.
"On the one hand, we have the security stakeholders saying, 'Get in there and investigate' and on the other side people somehow think we're investigating The Sun or journalists and we are not, we're looking at whether or not there was a contravention of the law, the data protection law."
The ICO said at the time of the raids that Emcor Group, which provides CCTV services at the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), submitted a breach report alleging the images were taken from the system without consent.
According to the regulator, the alleged breach falls under Section 170 of the Data Protection Act 2018, which does include a "public interest" defence under certain circumstances.
Denham warned that the Online Safety Bill, designed to better protect vulnerable people online from a range of threats such as child sex exploitation and terrorism content, could contend with similar "competing interests".
"I think the Online Safety Bill and the online harms regime is going to be facing the same kind of need to balance competing interests and that's just the nature of modern regulation and especially regulating new technology," she told PA.
Denham also said she would not be seeking information from the Sun, after editor-in-chief Victoria Newton said she would rather go to jail than reveal the names of their informants.
Meanwhile, the ICO has launched a separate inquiry into the use of private correspondence channels in DHSC.
It follows reports that Lord Bethell and Hancock routinely used private email accounts to discuss Government business.
"If you think about the pandemic and all the decisions that have been made that have affected people, their freedom to be able to move around, go to work, see their family, these kinds of decisions need to be preserved on a Government network in a Government system, especially when you think about the Government's promised inquiry," Denham said.
"My interest in this is to preserve and make sure that we preserve records that are related to one of the most important top political times that we've seen since the Second World War."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel