UNDER new proposals from the watchdog that sets their salaries, MPs could receive a pay rise over public sector workers.
The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa) calculates salaries for members of the Westminster parliament
The watchdog has set out a proposal that it be given new powers to vary MPs' annual pay "below or above” public sector pay.
It comes in a week when tens of thousands of workers in the public sector in England and Wales had their pay frozen, including for teachers and police officers.
It was also revealed yesterday that a 3% pay rise for NHS staff in England - thought to cost £2.2 billion - will come out of the NHS budget.
However, the watchdog has said that in the next recommendation, MP pay could potentially decrease.
READ MORE: Tory MPs threaten to boycott party conference if vaccine passports are required
An Ipsa spokesman said: “As we make clear in the consultation if current trends continue, we think it is more likely that we would be making a downward adjustment rather than an upward adjustment to the figure we use to determine pay for members of Parliament.”
A four-week consultation process is to be launched by the watchdog with conclusions coming in the autumn and an announcement on any pay change expected in the spring.
For the past five years, MPs' pay has been linked to public sector pay and updated every year by Ipsa to avoid members setting their own pay.
MPs are currently paid £81,932 a year and a recommended pay rise from Ipsa last year of around £3000 was rejected due to the pressures of the coronavirus pandemic.
Pay freezes for public sector workers have been heavily criticised.
The Police Federation of England and Wales said yesterday that it no longer has confidence in Priti Patel after the Home Secretary announced the freeze for officers earning more than £24,000. Those earning under that level are to receive an uplift of £250.
READ MORE: Critical workers to avoid self-isolation under new Scottish Government scheme
The decision was labelled an insult by one chief constable and the federation's chairman John Apter has said there is still time to regain the support of the 130,000 rank-and-file officers his organisation represents.
He said: "It’s not too late to do what the Health Secretary did, which is do a U-turn and make the announcement for the NHS staff.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel