THE Scottish Greens have denounced as “audacious doublespeak” from the head of the UK oil and gas industry body that drilling the Cambo field off Shetland will help cut carbon emissions.
Deirdre Michie, chief executive of Oil and Gas UK, defended the proposals, which led to a protest at the UK Government offices in Edinburgh on Monday, where the Stop Cambo group blocked the entrance to the building.
The protesters said it will produce 800 million new barrels of oil and is indefensible in the year where the UK is holding the COP26 international climate summit.
In an opinion article for The Scotsman, Michie said there would still be demand for oil and gas in the UK if fields like Cambo were halted. She said: “Instead, the country will have to import it from overseas - frequently from countries with higher emissions and less commitment to act on them.”
Michie said the industry had agreed a plan with the UK Government to reduce its carbon emissions, known as the North Sea Transition Deal.
READ MORE: Allowing the Cambo oil field is an act of environmental vandalism
She added: “Projects like the Cambo field are part of a low-carbon journey that will support energy security, jobs, the economy and the net-zero future that everyone wants to see. Like all future UK oil and gas projects, the Cambo field is designed with lower-operating emissions in mind.
“It has been built ‘electrification-ready’, with the potential to import renewable power when it becomes feasible in the future. It is in line with the industry’s decarbonisation targets, and it is included in the country’s long-term energy projections.”
The Scottish Green party said there could be no justification for opening a new oil field.
Climate spokesman Mark Ruskell said: “Deirdre Michie’s claim that opening a new oil field is ‘part of the low-carbon journey’ is audacious doublespeak from an industry determined to keep expanding fossil fuel production even when the world is committed to reduce it.
“The fact is the North Sea already has more oil than we can afford to burn if we are to meet the Paris climate commitments and secure our survival, so approving new fields would be a catastrophic decision by the UK Government.”
“The oil and gas industry cannot be trusted to plan for its own decline, we need urgent investment in the alternatives, like renewable energy and proven ways to decarbonise heat and transport.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel