CONSUMERS are supportive of the goal of net-zero emissions by 2045 but are “in the dark” over the challenges it will pose in their own lives, according to Citizens Advice Scotland.
Research for the charity carried out by YouGov found that 68% of Scottish adults supported moves towards net-zero by 2045, with 41% believing that reducing the impact of climate change should become more of a priority for the Scottish Government in the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Meanwhile, 59% thought making homes more energy efficient should be prioritised in the government’s climate response.
However, understanding of the impact of the measures required to meet net-zero were low, with 65% having “no identifiable energy efficiency measures or renewable technologies” installed in their home.
Citizen’s Advice Scotland’s fair markets spokesperson Kate Morrison said: “Later this year the eyes of the world will be on Scotland as Glasgow hosts Cop26, and this new briefing from Citizens Advice Scotland gives us a clear insight into how Scottish consumers view climate change.
“The good news is clear support for action towards net-zero, and support for energy efficiency in people’s homes being made more of a priority.
“However, consumers are in the dark over the impact of net-zero on their own lives, particularly when it comes to heating their homes.
“Most people did not realise use of natural gas would have to be phased out or reduced massively, and would not pick low-carbon heating systems as a measure they should take to reduce their carbon footprint.
“This really matters because changing to low-carbon heating will be essential if Scotland is to meet our emissions targets.
“When people did realise low- carbon heating was important, concerns switched to costs – whether the upfront cost of installation or potentially higher energy bills.”
She continued: “These concerns are totally understandable, but as we’ve seen in the recent Climate Change Committee reports, the reality is that not acting in time will result in consumers having to pay even more in the future.
“Policy-makers need to understand what these findings mean for our journey to net-zero, and have an honest conversation with the public of the role we have to play.
“While governments need to drive this change, it won’t happen without consumers understanding their role, and the impact it will have upon their lives.”
Among those polled for the research, 17% believe that reducing water usage should be a priority.
Water heating accounts for 5% of all UK carbon emissions – the same amount as the aviation industry.
Nine in ten of those polled were not aware most homes and businesses would need to replace their gas heating systems with an alternative source of heating, like heat pumps, if Scotland is to reduce its reliance on “blue” hydrogen to meet its climate change commitments.
Blue hydrogen is created from fossil fuel sources, where the carbon emissions are captured and stored, whereas green hydrogen is made from non-fossil sources.
Respondents were asked what might concern them if they were considering installing a low-carbon heating system.
Cost was the biggest barrier, with 67% concerned about high upfront costs and 55% fearing higher energy bills.
A majority of respondents said that non-repayable grants would encourage them to join efforts to reach net-zero, with 55% of people saying they would be encouraged to install low-carbon heating if they were offered non-repayable grants that covered part of the cost.
And 62% said it would encourage them to install energy efficiency measures in their home generally.
Council tax rebates in the years following installation were also seen as measures that could encourage consumers to switch to low-carbon heating systems.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel