THE complicated funding arrangement to cover the lavish refurbishments of Boris Johnson’s Downing Street flat has been detailed in an official report.
More than £28,000 was spent on painting and sanding floorboards to come close to the annual allowance afforded to the Prime Minister for renovations.
But additional invoices came in and were paid for by the Cabinet Office before being recharged to the Conservative Party in July last year, according to the report.
In March, the supplier – reportedly interior designer Lulu Lytle – refunded the Government, which then refunded the Tories, before Johnson met “all final costs”, the report detailed.
READ MORE: MPs overrule finding that Johnson breached code of conduct over Mustique holiday
The refurbishments to the flat in No 11 sparked sustained scrutiny of the Prime Minister’s finances and he was investigated by his own ministerial standards adviser, Lord Geidt.
Dominic Cummings, the Prime Minister’s hostile former chief adviser, had alleged that Johnson planned to have donors “secretly pay” for the revamp in an “unethical, foolish” and “possibly illegal” plan.
Lord Geidt found Johnson acted “unwisely” in allowing the refurbishment to go ahead without “more rigorous regard for how this would be funded”, but did not breach the ministerial code.
The standards adviser said Johnson had not been aware Tory donor Lord Brownlow initially had settled an invoice for the works.
Fresh details of the funding arrangements were detailed on page 209 of the Cabinet Office’s annual report, published yesterday.
READ MORE: Dominic Cummings's claim that Boris Johnson wants to scrap Holyrood sparks anger
The report says: “The Cabinet Office has a £30,000 budget each year for the upkeep of the dwellings within No 11 Downing Street.
“During 2020-21 Cabinet Office spent £28,647 with Mitie Facilities Management Limited at the request of the Prime Minister, which included painting and sanding of floorboards.
“Additional invoices for the refurbishment work undertaken on the No 11 Downing Street residence were received and paid for by the Cabinet Office and subsequently recharged to the Conservative Party in July 2020.
“In March 2021, the supplier refunded the Cabinet Office, and the Cabinet Office refunded the Conservative Party, with all final costs of wider refurbishment met by the Prime Minister personally.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel