THE UK Government is being urged to set out exactly how much cash Scotland will receive from a scheme designed to replace European funding following Brexit.
The Scottish Affairs Committee has called on ministers to clarify how much money will be made available north of the border as part of the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF).
It made the plea as it warned that “uncertainty” over the operation of the fund – which will run from 2022 – was “hindering planning efforts and poses risks to a smooth transition”.
Scotland received cash from the European Union for more than 40 years, with money having been received via both the European Regional Development Fund and the European Social Fund.
For the period 2014 to 2020, projects across Scotland were allocated £780 million – with the UK Government having committed to matching the funding the country would have received, had it still been in the EU.
But while it pledged in 2018 to hold a consultation on the design of the UKSPF, MPs on the Scottish Affairs Committee noted that “no formal consultation has yet been held by the UK Government”.
In a new report on the issue, the committee said: “We welcome the UK Government’s commitment that all UK nations will receive at least the same amount of funds under UKSPF as under the EU funds.
“It is, however, unclear how much funding will be available per year, even as an average.
“The UK Government’s multi-year funding profile should clarify how much funding will be available each year for the UK and for Scotland for at least the first five years of the UKSPF.”
The committee also insisted a consultation on the new fund should start by this autumn.
And it called for the Scottish and UK governments to “work constructively together in the design and delivery of the UKSPF”.
Speaking as the report was published, committee chair Pete Wishart MP (above) said: “It is no secret that Scotland benefited significantly from EU funds and led to many communities and universities to prosper.
“While we have been assured that UK replacement funds will match or exceed EU funds, we are yet to see any evidence of this.
“Nor have we been able to access information on the design of the UK Shared Prosperity Fund or how locations will be selected to receive grants.”
He added: “It is bewildering that there seems to have been no formal consultation and time is fast running out before the UK Shared Prosperity Fund begins next year.
“Our committee urges the UK Government to consult urgently and to provide clarity on funding for what could be a vital lifeline for businesses, universities and communities across Scotland.”
READ MORE: Richard Lochhead ‘disappointed’ as questions on post-Brexit funds go unanswered
The report has been published just days after Scottish Government ministers say they had had “no clear response” from Westminster on how the post-Brexit funding scheme will work – despite asking questions for almost two years.
A UK Government spokesperson said: “Our UK Shared Prosperity Fund will invest in people, communities and local business right across the country to level up and create opportunity where it is needed most.
“We have been engaging with a wide range of key stakeholders in Scotland and across all parts of the UK since 2016, and this has helped identify the opportunities for UKSPF policy, learning lessons from EU funding.
“We will increase UK-wide domestic funding to at least match what the EU currently offers – reaching around £1.5 billion a year.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel