THE New Caledonia government elected the first pro-independence figure as president of the South Pacific archipelago, a French territory that won broad autonomy following violence in 1988 and is scheduled to hold an independence referendum in five months.
Louis Mapou, a member of New Caledonia’s indigenous Kanak population, received six of 11 government votes, while French loyalist Thierry Santa got four.
One ballot was returned blank.
Mapou, 62, is a member of the Party of Kanak Liberation, or Palika, and the head of the National Union for Independence.
“We’re going to work hard. New Caledonia needs it,” Mapou said after the vote.
“Many think that we’ll have difficulty working for everyone, but I can guarantee you that working for New Caledonia will be the watchword of our commitment.”
The 270,000 inhabitants of the archipelago east of Australia include both the descendants of European colonisers and Kanaks, who once suffered from strict segregation policies. The election closes an institutional crisis triggered in February when the five pro-independence members of the government resigned to mark their disagreement over the sale of a nickel factory.
New Caledonia has long faced an existential dilemma over its status as a French colony.
A 1988 attack on gendarmes who were taken hostage and freed after deadly assault by special forces ultimately led to a peace deal.
A decade later, the Noumea Agreement granted New Caledonia political power and broad autonomy and plans for up to three referendums.
In October, a majority of voters chose to remain part of France instead of backing independence, leading French president Emmanuel Macron to call for dialogue.
The referendum was among the final steps in longstanding plans to settle tensions between Kanak people who favoured independence and residents willing to remain in France.
Two years ago, 56.4% of the participants in a similar referendum voted against independence.
The third referendum is set for December 12.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel