THE Home Office spent more than £370,000 to settle a top civil servant’s tribunal claim after he quit amid allegations of Priti Patel’s bullying, accounts confirm.

Former permanent secretary Sir Philip Rutnam accepted the six-figure sum earlier this year after launching legal action against the Home Secretary.

He dramatically resigned in February last year, accusing Patel of a “vicious and orchestrated” briefing campaign against him, claiming constructive dismissal and accusing her of bullying subordinates. 

An employment tribunal was due to hear his case in September.

READ MORE: UK Government settles with Home Office boss who accused Priti Patel of bullying

The Home Office’s annual report and accounts for 2020-21 confirm he received a payout of £340,000 plus legal costs – taking the spend to at least £370,000 plus VAT of an anticipated £6000.

Although the figures were previously reported, neither Rutnam’s representatives nor the department would publicly disclose the amount at the time.

The document, published on Thursday, said: “Sir Philip Rutnam resigned from his post as Permanent Secretary of the Home Office on 29 February 2020 and subsequently began legal proceedings against the department.

“On 4 March 2021, the Home Office and Sir Philip signed an agreement to settle these proceedings. As part of this settlement, the Home Office made a special payment of £340,000. A contribution to his legal costs was also made of £30,000 plus VAT.”

The National:

Reports emerged on February 20, 2020 that Patel had sought to remove Rutnam after a series of rows and that he had raised concerns about her with the Cabinet Office.

The Times newspaper claimed at the time that multiple sources inside the Home Office accused Patel of “bullying” and “belittling” officials. The Home Office said at the time no formal complaints had been made against her.

By February 29, Rutnam had left his post after a series of damning reports in the press, and launched a blistering attack on Patel and announced he would be pursuing a claim for “constructive, unfair dismissal” in the courts. 

In March, an inquiry was launched into the bullying claims but the full contents of the report would not be revealed until November. 

READ MORE: Priti Patel's ex-top official contradicts her defence to bullying inquiry

The National:

The BBC initially said a draft report concluded in the summer that Patel had broken the rules on the minister’s behaviour. 

On November 20, Sir Alex Allan, Boris Johnson’s adviser on ministerial standards, resigned after the Prime Minister contradicted his advice by judging Patel did not breach the rules despite being found to have bullied staff.

Allan said the Home Secretary had not always treated civil servants with “consideration and respect” and he had concluded that her approach on occasions “amounted to behaviour that can be described as bullying in terms of the impact felt by individuals”.

After Allan’s resignation, Patel said she was “sorry that my behaviour in the past has upset people”.