AN attempt to scrap stronger curbs on the right to protest has been rejected, despite concerns of the impact on human rights from the new Policing Bill.

The UK Government has proposed a raft of changes to the justice system in the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill.

These include plans to give police in England and Wales more powers to impose conditions on non-violent protests judged to be too noisy and thereby causing “intimidation or harassment” or “serious unease, alarm or distress” to the public.

Time and noise limits could be imposed as a result of the measures and those convicted could face a fine or jail.

Several protests have been held in response to the measures, with shouts of “kill the bill” heard.

The LibDems failed in a bid to cut the clauses from the bill last night after their amendments were voted down - the first by 354 votes to 273.

Describing the protest laws as "dangerous and draconian", LibDem home affairs spokesperson Alistair Carmichael (below) said the new laws "undermine the proud British tradition of standing up for what we believe in and respecting others’ rights to do the same".

The National: Alistair Carmichael was judged to have told a ‘blatant lie’

READ MORE: Questions over post-Brexit funds go 'unanswered for two years'

Labour's shadow home office minister Sarah Jones agreed that the bill "went too far" in its reforms to the legislation.

She said: “The point of protest is to capture attention, protests are noisy, sometimes they are annoying, but they are as fundamental to our democracy as our Parliament.”

And the bill also received criticism from former Tory Cabinet minister David Davis who pointed to a letter in The Times from a number of police chiefs airing their concerns.

He said: “And so it hasn’t just been the sort of lefty liberal legal fraternity that have been worried about this.”

But Home Office minister Victoria Atkins (below) said: “The bill does not stop the freedom to demonstrate. It balances that freedom against the rights and liberties of others.”

The National: Force bosses have called on Victoria Atkins to drop the Home Office’s resistance to the so-called shooting galleries

It is now possible for peers to make changes to the bill when it reaches the House of Lords for further scrutiny.

Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights questioned the need for the changes, finding “no evidence of a gap in the law” needing filled and there were already a “range of powers to deal with noise that impacts on the rights and freedoms of others”.

The bill runs to almost 300 pages and contains laws covering a wide range of issues such as violence prevention, police driving standards and criminal damage to statues.

Elsewhere, a Labour clause aiming to give shop workers more protection from violence and abuse was defeated by 350 votes to 233.

Atkins said the Government is “actively considering” such proposals “if appropriate” when the bill reaches the Lords.

READ MORE: Sarah Everard vigil saw police breach people's 'fundamental rights', MPs say

Tory MPs were among those calling on the Government to give those working in shops greater protections.

Former Tory minister Robert Goodwill MP said: "Shop workers have borne the brunt of much of the abuse regarding mask wearing and social distancing in store, on top of the existing problems associated with verification of age for the purposes of alcoholic drink purchase, drunken abusive behaviour and of course shoplifting.”

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill has been given a third reading after MPs voted by 365 votes to 265 in favour of it. It will go to the House of Lords at a later date.