BORIS Johnson’s administration has been urged by Labour to drop its “Trumpian tactics” to “rig democracy” with plans for voters to have to show ID before casting ballots at elections.
Labour said the proposals – due to be set out in today’s Elections Bill – are “undemocratic” and could lock millions of people out of democracy.
With the Government facing a Supreme Court challenge over their voter ID pilots – a case Labour said will not be heard until January – shadow ministers have warned that the Government could be forcing a potentially unlawful policy through Parliament.
Senior Conservatives and civil society groups have also raised concerns about the proposals.
Former Brexit secretary David Davis told The Independent there was “no evidence that ... there is a problem with voter fraud at polling stations”.
At the last General Election in 2019, 595 cases of alleged electoral fraud were investigated by police, according to the Electoral Commission.
Four led to a conviction and two people were given a police caution, and the commission said: “The UK has low levels of proven electoral fraud.”
Organisations including the Electoral Reform Society, Stonewall, Liberty, Operation Black Vote and the National Union of Students have called for a rethink of the voter ID scheme.
They said the plans could cost £20 million per General Election and 3.5 million people currently lack photographic ID.
Shadow democracy minister Cat Smith accused the Tories of attempting to use the “cover of the pandemic to threaten British democracy” and called for the plans to be stopped.
“Voter ID is a total waste of taxpayers’ money, set to cost millions of pounds at every election, and yet the Government apparently can’t afford to give our nurses a pay rise,” said Smith.
“Voting is safe and secure in Britain. Ministers should be promoting confidence in our elections instead of spreading baseless scare stories.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel