THE SNP must take action to draft a constitution for an independent state to prepare for the next referendum, an academic has argued.
Writing in today’s Seven Days, Dr Elliot Bulmer said the independence movement feels like it has been “wandering in the wilderness for a long time”.
He wrote: “Yet we seem no closer to the Promised Land. Where is the milk and honey? Are we just drifting in the desert, waiting for the Section 30 order to magically appear?”
He argued the SNP appeared to have a “credible constitutional plan” for the establishment of a new Scottish state from 1977 to around 2005, which was not perfect but served as draft which was ready to go on the “very day when the flags change on Edinburgh Castle”.
But he went on: “There is no sign that the current SNP leadership knows what a constitution is, what a constitution does, or why a constitution is essential and integral to the case for independence.
“At best, they seem to see it as a ‘nice to have’, a cherry-on-the-cake that can be delayed until the opportune time. They have no apparent understanding that independence is a state-building project and that the constitution, as the blueprint and foundation for the state, is the only place to start.
“They do not understand how much campaigning traction could be gained by a good constitution, both in mobilising the base of independence supporters and in reassuring wavering Unionists that independence need not be the end of their world.”
Bulmer said unless there was a proper constitution setting out clear foundations for democracy, good governance, public ethics and human rights in Scotland, then there was a risk of slipping back into “the Pharaonic despotism of ‘parliamentary sovereignty’ and the inscrutable ‘unwritten constitution’”.
He added: “If the SNP leadership still believe in independence, they need to show it – now – by doing the preparatory work necessary to bring it about.
“That means passing a Constitutional Transition Act to establish a Constituent Assembly with clear terms of reference to draft a constitution for an independent state, to be submitted to the people in the next referendum.”
A spokesperson for the SNP said: “Led by political director Michael Russell, the SNP is establishing a dedicated taskforce to bring forward a comprehensive case for independence, which will be put before the people of Scotland in a post-pandemic referendum when it is safe to do so.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel