A 57-YEAR-OLD man has been charged after a journalist was confronted and chased by protesters near Downing Street.
Martin Hockridge is accused of using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour towards another person with the intention to cause them harassment, alarm or distress.
It comes after footage shared on social media showed demonstrators shouting abuse in the face of Newsnight political editor Nick Watt.
Watt, who was wearing a BBC lanyard, was forced to run through the mob beyond a line of police officers as people shouted “traitor” and other slurs at him near Downing Street.
The Metropolitan Police said they have begun reviewing the footage and identified a number of possible offences and launched an investigation.
Crowds had gathered in Westminster to protest against the UK Government’s extension of coronavirus restrictions in England by four weeks.
The treatment of Watt was widely condemned as “disgraceful” and “appalling”.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson tweeted: “Disgraceful to see the hounding of Nick Watt doing his job. The media must be able to report the facts without fear or favour – they are the lifeblood of our democracy.”
Home Secretary Priti Patel Patel tweeted: “The video of @BBCNewsnight’s Nick Watt being abused by a mob is appalling and distressing.
“This behaviour is never acceptable.”
She added: “The safety of journalists is fundamental to our democracy.”
The BBC said in a statement after the footage was shared: “This behaviour is completely unacceptable.
“All journalists should be able to carry out their work without intimidation or impediment.”
The Met initially said an investigation would be launched into a “number of offences” but that officers “were not in the immediate vicinity of the incident”.
However, following the emergence of another longer video showing police present at the scene, the force said it would also be “reviewing our actions with a view to improving the policing of events”.
Hockridge, of Harpenden, Hertfordshire, is charged under Section 4A of the Public Order Act and is due to appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Tuesday June 29.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article