THE appeal before the European Court of Human Rights (EHCR) for jailed Catalan independence leader Jordi Cuixart will affect the defence of fundamental rights throughout Europe, it has been claimed.
Cuixart is serving nine years’ imprisonment after being found guilty of sedition for his role in the 2017 Catalan independence referendum, but an international media conference organised by Omnium Cultural, the grassroots body he leads, heard his case went beyond a row with Spain.
Olivier Peter, one of his legal team, told the event: “If there are so many of us here today, it is because the Cuixart case is putting at risk the whole system of fundamental rights in Europe.
“It is a European appeal because the result will have effects on the fundamental rights of the whole of European society.”
The lawyer listed some Cuixart’s rights which had been violated, including the right to demonstrate, to a fair trial and effective defence, the principle of legality, and protection against arbitrary detention.
He added that he was "very confident" the Strasbourg appeal would be successful.
Nobel Peace Prize winner Jody Williams, speaking in a recorded message from the US, said the case was “one of the most egregious examples” of state power being used to silence people.
Meanwhile, as Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez moves closer towards pardons for the nine jailed indy figures, Catalan President Pere Aragones said while that would be a welcome “first step”, the path to resolving the dispute with Madrid lay with talks on allowing a legal indyref.
The leader of the Republican Left (ERC) told Reuters the pardons would not resolve the underlying problem, and called for an amnesty for all those involved in the 2017 indyref.
He said: “Pardons should be a first step in a negotiation stage, of recognising the national conflict between Catalonia and the Spanish state”, eventually allowing “Catalan citizens to decide".
Aragones is due to meet Sanchez in Madrid later this month, and said a referendum and amnesty would be his main requests, and said he was “absolutely convinced” Catalonia would eventually become a separate country.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here