A MAN who was run over by a bakery delivery driver while lying drunk in the middle of a road can recover damages, an appeal court has ruled.
Samuel Cameron was driven over while he lay intoxicated on a street “apparently asleep” in Paisley, Renfrewshire, at around 5am on April 23, 2016.
Martin Swan, the driver, had been overtaking a taxi and is said to have failed to see Mr Cameron, despite street lights being on.
A previous decision dismissed a motion for interim damages, however the Inner House of the Court of Session has now ruled that legal action should not have been refused.
It said: “On the evidence before him, the first defender had (as he himself accepted) an unimpeded view along the off-side of the taxi as he approached the locus where the pursuer was lying.
“He failed to see him as he lay on the road. That is prima facie evidence that he failed to keep a good lookout.
READ MORE: Former UK civil servant reveals why he's moving towards Yes
“A driver has a duty to take reasonable care for other persons using the highway; even persons who are lying on it in a drunken stupor.
“The first defender had a duty to take reasonable care to keep a good lookout on the road ahead and not to overtake other vehicles unless it was safe to do so; that is when the road could be seen to be sufficiently clear. He did not do so.”
Digby Brown, which represented Mr Cameron, welcomed the decision.
Stuart Barton, partner with the firm’s serious injury team, said: “For the last few years Mr Cameron has shown great strength of character during his recovery as his injuries had a truly life-changing impact.
“We therefore welcome this judgment as it will help provide our client with more opportunities to access the rehabilitation, support and future he deserves.
“Today’s ruling is indeed a significant and positive milestone but the civil action is still ongoing so it would be inappropriate to comment further.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel