A MAN has denied murdering his three-year-old son and the child’s mother more than 40 years ago.
Christina “Renee” MacRae, 36, was last seen driving out of Inverness with her child Andrew, aged three, on November 12, 1976.
It is alleged that William MacDowell, 79, assaulted his son, Andrew, and Ms MacRae at the Dalmagarry lay-by at the A9 trunk road, Dalmagarry or elsewhere on that date and that he caused them injury by unknown means, as a result of which they died, and murdered them.
He is also charged with attempting to defeat the ends of justice by disposing of the two bodies and their personal effects by means unknown to prosecutors.
READ MORE: Case for ditching Scottish verdict option has not been proven
MacDowell, 79, is accused of disposing of a pushchair, setting fire to a BMW vehicle and disposing of a boot hatch from a Volvo vehicle to conceal the alleged crimes and avoid detection, arrest and prosecution.
The 79-year-old, from Penrith, Cumbria, did not appear at the hearing at the High Court in Glasgow in person on Monday for medical reasons.
His lawyer, Murray Macara QC, entered not guilty pleas to all charges on his behalf and lodged special defences of alibi and incrimination.
Mr Macara said that more than 1500 people provided statements in the case and work needs to be done to establish which of these witnesses are still alive.
Advocate Depute Alex Prentice QC, prosecuting, said it is not known how long a trial would last though he tentatively suggested it could be around 15 days but said this may be “wholly unrealistic".
He said: “This is a case which arises from events in 1976 and the volume of papers and other material is extensive.
“There has been very good co-operation between the Crown and the defence.”
The Crown has suggested that the trial could be held in Inverness and that a jury could be beamed in from elsewhere but the location of the trial has not yet been decided.
Lord Matthews continued the case until a further hearing on July 22.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel