THERE has been “significant community transmission” of coronavirus in the Glasgow hotspots, according to Scotland's Health Secretary.
The city will remain under Level 3 of Scotland’s restrictions until at least June 5 and Humza Yousaf said urgent work was being carried out to understand the outbreak in south Glasgow and how the Indian variant arrived.
He told BBC Radio 4’s Today: “In a few concentrated hotspots … we are seeing significant community transmission.
“The levels and the numbers of cases are continuing to rise.”
READ MORE: Social media sleuths take on mystery over Covid vaccine letters
In other parts of the country “local health teams tell us they are relatively contained outbreaks” linked to either schools or domestic clusters, but that was not the case in Glasgow.
“What we are seeing is it’s coming in in areas where there is a large, diverse community so therefore there is a probability the variant has come in from international travel.
“Therefore we are trying to get to the bottom of how it managed to get in.
Meanwhile a public health expert has said moving parts of Scotland in Level 2 of coronavirus restrictions with high case rates to higher levels would be “difficult”.
Linda Bauld (above), professor of public health at the University of Edinburgh, spoke about the reasons behind Glasgow being the sole council area remaining in Level 3.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon announced yesterday that the local authority would remain at the higher level for at least another week due to an “uncomfortably high” level of cases amid an outbreak driven by the Indian variant of the virus.
She said a decision would be made by Wednesday at the latest on whether the city can move to Level 2 next Saturday.
People in the city are not able to meet other households indoors in their homes and there are stricter restrictions on hospitality, including a ban on selling alcohol indoors. Non-essential travel in and out of the city is prohibited.
Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland programme, Bauld said the Scottish Government has “stalled” Glasgow in Level 3 due to concern about whether rising cases are leading to more people in hospital.
“They are just hanging on a little bit longer to make sure they can be confident that cases are not translating to more people in hospital,” she said.
“In contrast, there are worrying signs in parts of Edinburgh – Silverknowes and Davidson’s Mains.
“In Renfrewshire and Midlothian there are high cases but because they are already in Level 2 to then reverse that, policy-wise, would be more difficult.”
Speaking on the same programme, Stephen Reicher from the University of St Andrews and a member of the Sage sub-committee advising on behavioural science, said caution is the correct approach over the Glasgow outbreak.
He said: “We’ll find out within a week or two exactly how serious it is. If it’s very bad, we’ll learn in a week or so. If it’s bad, we’ll learn in a couple of weeks.
“I think it’s worth pausing for a moment or two rather than to have to face the possibility of going back to the really dark days of January and February.”
He added: “Hospitalisations are going up at moment, we’re not yet seeing increases in people at intensive care units and thankfully we’re not seeing deaths yet.
“The real danger is if you wait until you’re certain then the difficulty is it might be too late, you might have reseeded this variant and we might then inevitably in two or three weeks’ time see the terrible statistics in ICUs and deaths going up.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel