A GIANT Brexit lorry park “as bright as Wembley Stadium” is dominating the night sky in Kent and ruining the views of hundreds of people.
The border facility, which is still under construction, was set up by the Government to hold around 1700 lorries in case of border disruption after the UK left the single market.
But residents have complained that the lorry park’s bright lights are on 24/7 as well as reporting that satnav issues see HGV drivers regularly causing havoc as they try to navigate narrow village lanes.
Questions have also been raised about why a study on the impact of the site on the environment has not yet been released by the Government.
READ MORE: Michael Russell: Tories' continuing Brexit damage worthy of a Greek tragedy
The Department for Transport (DfT) said it is aware of residents’ concerns and has “acted to minimise disturbance”.
While officially referred to as an “inland border facility”, nearly 29,000 people signed a petition calling for it to be named after Nigel Farage.
The controversial lorry park is located beside the M20 in Sevington, Ashford, and is currently being used as a Covid-19 testing site for hauliers as well as HMRC checks.
Mandy Rossi, who lives in nearby Willesborough, told PA that the inland border facility is “hideously ugly” and has taken “a massive, massive chunk” out of the landscape.
The local Green Party co-ordinator said the bright lights can be seen from up to four miles away.
“It’s just this massive lit-up area,” she said.
“The lights can be seen for miles and are as bright as Wembley Stadium.
“If you go to Wye, which is on top of the hill, at night time, all you can see is the lorry park.”
People living near the site have also complained about lorries being given the postcode for the site but getting lost in the village of Mersham.
Rossi added: “It’s not built for HGVs.
“We have had reports of people’s walls being taken down, damage to cars, lorries getting stuck.”
She also criticised the Department for Transport’s (DfT) refusal to release the results of an environmental impact study conducted in relation to the site.
“This is appalling.
“There is a huge environmental impact, and we have a right to know,” she added.
Local councillor Paul Bartlett, whose garden is 25 yards away from the lorry park, told PA that it has been a “rocky road”, with things going both well and wrong.
“I think we have to accept that this development was done at pace, to put it mildly.
“I suppose the biggest issue is the lorries that are looking for the lorry park and are struggling to find it,” he said.
He said HGVs arrive in the village only to find they cannot get to the site, and then have to turn round in the narrow roads.
He said this is causing disruption to villagers, and called on the DfT to “get a grip” on the issue.
Asked about the light pollution, the Conservative councillor said it has had “a dramatic detrimental effect on the dark sky that we are used to”.
Bartlett pointed out that the lorry park was built to DfT standards, whereas local developments scrutinised by Ashford Borough Council have to conform to different stringent lighting regulations.
Looking to the future, he said he has seen a “genuine desire” at DfT to hear concerns and take action on them.
A DfT spokesperson said: “We are aware of residents’ concerns and have acted to minimise disturbance by turning off the lights in one of the most public sections of the site as well as commissioning a detailed lighting survey to better understand the issue and develop a plan to address it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel