NICOLA Sturgeon does not want an independence referendum but wants to talk about one to distract from her “abysmal” record, a Tory former Scottish secretary has argued.
The First Minister and SNP leader would only want a vote when she was sure she could win it, and support was on the decline, said Michael Forsyth.
The Conservative grandee was also critical of Boris Johnson and his Cabinet for failing to travel north of the border and make the case for the Union at the recent election to the Scottish Parliament.
He made his comments as peers continued to debate the Queen’s Speech, which set out the Government’s legislative programme.
Sturgeon has already told the Prime Minister that the Holyrood election – in which a majority of independence-supporting MSPs were returned – means it is now a case of “when not if” there is another vote on the issue.
READ MORE: 'No empathy': Nicola Sturgeon condemns Home Office after Glasgow asylum protests
It comes after the SNP was elected for a record fourth term in power, on the basis of a manifesto which promised another vote on independence before the end of 2023.
While the SNP narrowly failed to get a majority, falling one short with a tally of 64 MSPs, the record eight Scottish Green MSPs that were voted in means there is a majority for independence in the new parliament.
Speaking at Westminster, Forsyth said: “I’d like to share a secret and I find saying things in this House is a good way of keeping them secret … Nicola doesn’t want a referendum. The last thing she wants is a referendum.
“Because she only wants a referendum when she is sure she can win it. They themselves said that they would need at least 60% of the electorate supporting them and support is on the decline.
“But she does want to talk about having a referendum because it is a diversion from her record – her record which is abysmal.
“Scotland is the drugs capital of Europe with 24 funerals every week and [Sturgeon] thinks she should be concentrating on talking about the need for a referendum.”
Forsyth also questioned where Cabinet members had been during the campaign, pointing out Michael Gove only came to Scotland the day after the votes had been counted.
He said: “We need ministers to go north of the border and explain to people how they benefit from having the strength of the United Kingdom around them, because they do not know it, and to lose it would put us in desperate, desperate times, faced with Nicola Sturgeon’s Brigadoon vision of an economy.”
Opening the debate, Advocate General for Scotland Keith Stewart warned against a further referendum, telling peers: “Now is not the time to stoke old divisions but to throw ourselves into what unites people across the UK – recovering from the pandemic.
READ MORE: Ruth Davidson hit with backlash after moaning about vaccine rollout
“When we work collaboratively – one team UK – we are safer, stronger and more prosperous. Far better able to tackle the shared challenges that all parts of the UK face together.”
Conservative former Scotland Office minister Andrew Dunlop, who carried out a review of devolution, said strengthening the Union required “urgent attention”.
He added: “However, in searching for solutions care should be taken not to overreact or adopt drastic changes which may inadvertently destabilise the relationships between the nations and regions of our country.
“For all the excitable commentary, the reality is as it was five years ago.”
Arguing there was no Scottish consensus on independence, Dunlop said: “There will not be another independence referendum unless and until those wishing one think it can be won.
“And for those of us who care about the Union, the task is to ensure that day never comes.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel