‘SAFE to fly” – a new mantra that is repeated continuously. Where can the delusional, ignorant, self-obsessed populace fly to safely? All our media, including this paper, never mention that the real answer is “nowhere”.
Has nobody learned anything? The pandemic should have given our Anthropocene world leaders a clear vision of an opportunity to re-evaluate “recovery”, if and when Covid-19 is brought under better control. “Recovery” is being bandied about as a desirable objective where our global exploitation can not just get back to what it was, but to be increased apace. Every politician can hardly resist giving a sound-bite to camera without at least once referring to a “growth” – that only relates to economic growth.
Do they all lack the vision to see where this leads? Never once does any journalist call them out to interrogate them as to how such growth is sustainable, given the world’s richest countries already having gone well past the exploitation of the planet’s finite resources that is justifiable or could be continued.
How many of our populations are duped by the gormless notion that we could exploit or even populate other planets or moons in the solar system to ameliorate the effects of over-exploitation of Earth? Perhaps they are the same huge cohort that think “I’m all right, Jack” – or perhaps part of the even larger group of completely apathetic people.
Who am I pointing my finger at? If the cap fits, you should be wearing it with shame. I and my family acknowledge that we ourselves need to be doing more. We need more regression, more retrenchment. We need less consumption and much, much less reliance on fossil fuels. We need to see much, much more education devoted to developing a citizenry that will work to reduce human impact on the planet.
Politicians that commit and enact legislation for such education and real climate reduction measures are an absolute necessity.
What policies might be included? How about an individual carbon allowance? Professor Zubov has written that life monitoring/controlling computer algorithms already exist. A meat/red meat allowance? Professor Lang has recently published “Feeding Britain” that explains how the UK suffers food insecurity, with so much land dedicated to feeding ruminants. Yes, we all need to change and change now to much greater reliance on plant and locally produced vegetable consumption.
How about an effective tax on advertising? It is not beyond our wit to write rules that identify products that can be deemed to be completely unnecessary and make advertising of such subject to tax – perhaps twice the stated production/distribution/retail costs. I watched this morning on TV an advertising executive puffing about the need to increase advertising to recover “growth”.
So, before you discuss with your friends whether it is safe to fly, rub your eyes, wake up, and check this precious planet that we and all life forms cling to. Living in this still wondrous country of Scotland, you really don’t need to fly anywhere, except for a very few reasons that might be deemed vital to future human existence.
Will this affect thousands of people involved in airline transportation and the travel sector? Undoubtedly. Again, interrogation of politicians, might help focus their minds on critical steps to adapt our society for mitigation of the disruption and change that we should all undergo.
Keith MacLeod
via email
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel