THERE are no loyalty bonuses for avid election debate watchers.
The politicians and broadcasters don’t thank us for our commitment. Instead, we are treated to a re-hash of the same lines we’ve heard before.
At this stage in a campaign, the lines are delivered with more urgency than they were at the start but they lose their fizz when we’re able to predict what a party leader is going to say before they say it.
Still, we had high hopes for Channel 4’s election debate. As is so often the case in Scottish politics, that optimism proved to be misplaced.
Firstly, the set. I don’t know why broadcasters favour the dark and gloomy Dracula’s basement- style set-up. Would it hurt to put party leaders in a well-lit room with maybe a few potted plants scattered around?
Next, the format. Of the three debates, this was the worst. If there was a structure it was hard to find. Time was short, and predictably the leaders shouted over one another to make sure they were heard.
The end result of that was that nobody was heard. Nothing was heard. Apart from the ringing in your ears.
And finally, the leaders. Anas Sarwar, who has emerged as the golden boy of the campaign, tripped up. In an exchange between Nicola Sturgeon and Douglas Ross on the constitution, he interjected to patronisingly remind everybody that “we’re in the middle of a pandemic” as though anybody could have forgotten.
Willie Rennie was missing in action.
Nicola Sturgeon rarely got a word in without being shouted over but when she did, she was strong.
Patrick Harvie had some good lines but got lost in the rammy.
Douglas Ross went on the offensive and his tactic of screaming over everybody else was even more embarrassing and ill-judged than his Atomic Kitten dance routine.
Those with even the lowest of expectations will have still been disappointed with that shambles of a debate.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel