BORIS Johnson has denied he tried to block an official leak inquiry following a series of incendiary allegations by his former top adviser.
In a furious outburst on his blog, Dominic Cummings accused the Prime Minister of seeking to halt the investigation into the leak of plans for a second lockdown after he was warned a close friend of his fiancee Carrie Symonds could be implicated.
He also claimed Johnson had attempted an “unethical, foolish, possibly illegal” plan to get Tory donors to fund the lavish refurbishment of his official Downing Street flat.
The claims prompted speculation Cummings is bent on revenge after his dramatic departure last year from No 10 amid a bitter internal power struggle with Symonds.
Ministers are braced for further allegations when he appears next month before MPs investigating the Government’s response to the coronavirus pandemic.
Johnson sought to brush off the charges saying the public did not “give a monkey’s” about such matters.
Asked by LBC radio if he had tried to block the leak inquiry, the Prime Minister replied: “No, of course not.”
Downing Street said in a statement that ministers had acted at all times “in accordance with the appropriate codes of conduct and electoral law”.
Labour said the Tories were fighting “like rats in a sack” demonstrating a “breath-taking contempt” for the public.
Cummings’ onslaught was prompted by briefing to newspapers that Johnson believed he was behind a series of leaks including text messages exchanges in which the Prime Minister promised to “fix” a tax issue for the entrepreneur Sir James Dyson.
READ MORE: Dominic Cummings blamed for text leaks among Number 10 sources
In a lengthy blog post he accused Johnson of ordering his aides to make false allegations about him and offered to give evidence to the Cabinet Secretary Simon Case.
He went on to deny a No 10 claim that he was the so-called “chatty rat” responsible for the leak last October which was seen to have “bounced” the Government into announcing a second lockdown.
He said Case told both him and Johnson that “all the evidence” pointed to Henry Newman, a special adviser and a close friend of Symonds, and “others in that office” as having been responsible.
The Prime Minister, he said, had been “very upset” as it would cause him “very serious problems” with Symonds if Newman had to be fired and had asked whether the leak inquiry could be stopped.
Cummings said he told Johnson that was “mad” and “totally unethical” and that he could not cancel an inquiry into a leak which had affected millions of people “just because it might implicate his girlfriend’s friends”.
“It is sad to see the PM and his office fall so far below the standards of competence and integrity the country deserves,” he said.
Johnson, who spent yesterday campaigning in Hartlepool by-election, insisted he was concentrating on protecting the health of the public, adding: “I don’t think people give a monkey’s about this issue”.
In a statement, Downing Street said that Johnson had “never interfered” in a Government leak inquiry.
READ MORE: Dominic Cummings: Boris Johnson wanted inquiry stopped to protect fiancee's friend
In response to Cummings’ claims about the funding of the flat refurbishment, the statement said: “At all times, the Government and ministers have acted in accordance with the appropriate codes of conduct and electoral law.
“Cabinet Office officials have been engaged and informed throughout and official advice has been followed.”
Earlier a Government statement said that Johnson had met the cost of the flat refurbishment – which reportedly ran to £200,000 – out of his own pocket.
Former foreign secretary Lord Hague said he did not know if there was any truth in the claims but said that Downing Street would need to come up with some “good answers”.
“If all of these things were true, they would be damaging to anybody, including a prime minister,” he told Times Radio.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel