JIM Osborne makes some valid points in yesterday’s article on banks, but it is ultimately attacking the wrong issue (Here’s a monopoly we don’t want in our new Scotland, April 19). The UK problem – and it is especially a UK problem, though the US also suffers from the same disease – is the state and government policies that have been pursued by both parties since the 1970s.
It is state policy to goose the housing market in the UK, and the banks have simply responded to the directions from a higher authority. As a general rule, deposit-taking commercial banks should not lend for mortgages and the like AT ALL. That was exactly why the building societies were set up. They took fixed deposits of one or more years, which gave them the security of being able to make long-term loans (and the would-be borrowers were tied in too).
READ MORE: Here’s why an independent Scotland must take away the monopoly from private banks
You need to have the maturities on your deposits relatively well matched to the maturities on your assets. In the deposit-taking bank the deposits can leave en masse in minutes, which is why granting a 25-year mortgage should be out of the question. Long-term loans (which are also generally illiquid) are exceptionally dangerous for high street banks and have been the cause of most banking crises. 2008 was no exception to that.
Historically, high street banks confined themselves mostly to short-term loans such as discounting bills, overdrafts and the like. Merchant banks were different and they were the place that was more involved with business lending, but merchant banks did not take deposits from the public or run normal current accounts etc.
It is state policy to promote the finance sector and the City of London at the expense of all else. We were “post-industrial” according to the Thatcherites, and industry was disposable.
It is state policy to favour consumption over investment.
It is state policy to favour rent extraction and dubious capital gains and to penalise paid employment and patient long-term investment.
It is state policy to promote excessive personal debt (personal or student loans, credit cards, etc).
You can add much more to that list of wrong policies.
I think if the fiscal and monetary policies of the state are sorted out then the rest will largely, with a bit of pushing and shoving, sort itself out. People and business respond to the incentives, and at the moment those state policies mean the incentives are all wrong. Reforming banks will achieve little on its own.
Dr Tim Rideout
Convener, Scottish Currency Group
I NEVER thought I would be (almost) grateful to Alex Salmond (Indy Scotland must have its own currency, April 18) for letting this huge elephant out of the room. Many of us in the Scottish Currency Group have been raising for some time that it is absolutely essential to prepare for this very thing.
Unless I have missed it, there is nothing appearing anywhere from all political parties in the campaign despite the SNP passing a motion at conference in 2019 submitted by Dr Tim Rideout that “Scotland would move to establish its own currency” shortly achieving independence.
There are many people much more qualified than I to describe MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), in particular Professor Stephanie Kelton, but what should jump out of The Sunday Times is this quote by Irwin Steiner, referring to President Biden’s actions in response to the pandemic: “It’s not easy to follow the trillions trail ... six relief bills have pumped $5.3 trillion [£3.3 trillion] in newly created fiat money into the economy, equal to about 25% of GDP.”
This undoubtedly confirms that creating digital money is alive and well in the United States, which as a currency issuer can never go bust. Similarly, the Bank of England as a currency issuer will NEVER go bust – so please, Mr Chancellor, do not deny that this is how the cost of Covid and any other related expenditure is being covered.
In the exactly the same way, an independent Scotland will become a currency issuer very quickly after independence to properly fund the expenditure necessary to create new policies in a new country, which will care for its people. I cannot wait.
Alex Thomson
Coldstream
SOOO, the SNP manifesto comes out and this is the big Alex Salmond Party (aka Alba) response.
As I remember it, the SNP position is to move to a Scottish currency when it is economically favourable to do so. Which makes sense to do until all the current UK public pensions, benefits and other key financial issues currently operating in Sterling are sorted, such as the small matter of Scotland’s trillion-pound (Sterling) financial and banking sector.
The markets are all ready expecting an oil and gas-backed Scottish currency to rise rapidly in value over Sterling on floatation. Just another wee problem if Scotland goes straight for its own currency without first sorting the current dependency on Sterling.
That leaves this as just another bit of megaphone, populist politics from Mr Salmond.
Peter Thomson
via thenational.scot
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel