BORIS Johnson can’t stand in the way of a second independence referendum if pro-independence parties win a majority, Nicola Sturgeon has said.
The Prime Minister has so far rejected calls by Holyrood to agree to indyref2, but the First Minister believes the UK Government is coming to the realisation that it can't say no indefinitely.
She told the Guardian: "If people in Scotland vote for a party saying, 'when the time is right, there should be an independence referendum', you cannot stand in the way of that, and I don't think that is what will happen."
Sturgeon said she believes discussions within the UK government had "moved away from 'we can stop a referendum' to 'when would it happen, and on what basis would it happen?'"
She commented: "People will always challenge that because of what the supposed position of the UK Government is," adding that she is "pretty confident" the SNP's plan B of a referendum bill at Scottish Parliament will not be needed.
READ: Senior Tories urge PM to force indyref2 during pandemic to torpedo Yes victory
In an 11-point plan earlier this year, her party said it would announce a referendum through legislation at Holyrood if there is an SNP majority but the UK Government refused to grant a Section 30 order, effectively daring Westminster to challenge it in the courts.
Sturgeon said her "strong preference and intention" is to hold another referendum in the first half of the parliament, up to 2023, but she will be "guided by the realities of Covid".
She also addressed comments from her predecessor as first minister, Alex Salmond, in his role as leader of the Alba Party, that peaceful protests and legal action could also be used in pursuit of independence, saying they could put off potential independence supporters.
Sturgeon added: "If you're somebody that voted no in 2014 and ... because of Brexit or other things, are now open-minded to independence – and I know an awful lot of these people – and you hear somebody say they think they can bulldoze their way to independence in spite of public opinion, I would think, 'maybe I don't want to engage in this any more'."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel