THE NEC of Action for Independence (AFI), the fledgling pro-independence party that launched the “Max the Yes” concept for the Holyrood election, was due to consider its next moves last night after the launch of Alex Salmond’s Alba Party.
Members were notified by email after Alba’s launch that its list candidates for the May 6 poll would be stood down amid developments that had been a “game changer” for AFI.
They were told: “That is a great compliment to all of you who have pioneered the ‘Max the Yes’ concept and the drive for a ‘supermajority’ in May.”
An email from Salmond was also copied in to them thanking them for preparing the groundwork: “I recognise that you were there first and Alba hope to carry the torch of independence forward into the next Scottish Parliament.”
The NEC had earlier agreed that AFI would continue as an independence campaign group and would “de-register” as a political party, noting to free it from Electoral Commission control.
Before last night’s meeting though, it was known the move to stand down candidates in favour of Alba’s picks was not entirely popular with AFI members.
One told The National: “There’s a lot of dissatisfaction amongst the members.
“We always knew there was a possibility of Alex Salmond coming in and changing the dynamic, but some of us had hoped he could have been persuaded to come on board with us, not mount a takeover.”
Another said: “I wouldn’t be surprised if AFI was simply testing the waters for Alba with the supermajority plan.
“If that were the case, it’s a great insult to the candidates we were fielding.”
None of AFI’s candidates found a place on the Alba list, but one – former NEC member and indy campaigner Martin Keatings – is now standing as an independent for the presiding officer at Holyrood.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel