ANGUS MacNeil has revealed he had no intention of defecting to Alba – though he welcomed their arrival as a new pro-independence political force and called for a positive debate with its members.
There was intense speculation for most of the week that the Western Isles SNP MP would be among the SNP politicians making the switch to Alex Salmond’s new party, which is aiming to get a supermajority for independence at Holyrood.
Two of MacNeil’s colleagues at Westminster, Kenny MacAskill and Neale Hanvey have moved over to Alba and like Salmond are hoping to win seats in the Scottish Parliament via the regional lists.
MacNeil is also a close political ally of Inverclyde councillor Chris McEleny, with both politicians pushing the SNP to come up with an alternative Plan B to independence if Prime Minister Boris Johnson continues to reject an agreed referendum as he has repeatedly said he will. McEleny has switched from the SNP to Alba and is among the party’s candidates.
Salmond’s announcement last week that he was to lead Alba provoked fierce criticism from some in the SNP.
READ MORE: Alex Salmond's Alba will not return any MSPs to Holyrood, says Survation poll
Glasgow South SNP MP Stewart McDonald mocked the former First Minister’s press conference and the SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford described MacAskill as “an embarrassment” when he defected to Alba.
“The more parties of independence the better, eventually of course all parties will be parties of independence – same story in every country,” MacNeil told The National.
“Also I won’t be encouraging snide or smearing remarks about the Alba Party, we should instead be arguing against those trying to block independence, not denigrate those who are for it and keeping the discourse positive.”
Asked about whether he had considered leaving the SNP to join Alba, he said: “I had no intention of joining, it was never something I intended to do.
“I can’t say that I am unhappy that there is a change in the dial on the focus on independence in this election.
“It makes the Scottish election very interesting indeed. Anybody who thinks independence is important will be pleased there are now two serious parties of independence rather than one.”
Asked about allies such as McEleny defecting to Alba and the Plan B debate, he added: “Someone will have to stay in the SNP and fight that corner.”
Pressed if he would be voting SNP in both the constituency and regional list section of the ballot, he said: “I can see the argument people have when they use calculators and logic. If all SNP votes were to transfer on the list to Alba you would have 30 odd Alba seats and 30 less London party MSPs, but of course that is using logic and sense. Using politics as I do and have to do, it’s both votes SNP of course.”
READ MORE: Douglas Ross fails to form pro-Union alliance with Labour and LibDems
MacNeil went on to say that Michael Russell’s 11-point plan to deliver an independence vote “would have to deliver” but if it did not then he believed the 2026 Holyrood election would be an effective independence referendum adding: “Unless of course there are enough MSPs to [call an early election] before 2026.”
Alba are not standing in any constituency seats but are fielding four candidates in each of the eight regional lists in Scotland.
Salmond tops the north east regional list and MacAskill the Lothian list. Other candidates include former SNP MPs George Kerevan, Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh and Corri Wilson.
They also include the former SNP women’s convener Caroline McAllister and former equalities convener Lynne Anderson.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel